Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Laboratory biosafety measures involving SARS-CoV-2 and the classification as a Risk Group 3 biological agent.
Kaufer, Alexa M; Theis, Torsten; Lau, Katherine A; Gray, Joanna L; Rawlinson, William D.
  • Kaufer AM; Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs, Biosecurity Department, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: alexa.kaufer@rcpaqap.com.au.
  • Theis T; Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs, Biosecurity Department, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Lau KA; Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs, Biosecurity Department, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Gray JL; Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs, Biosecurity Department, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Rawlinson WD; Serology and Virology Division (SAViD), NSW Health Pathology, SOMS and BABS, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Pathology ; 52(7): 790-795, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1042622
ABSTRACT
The current public health emergency surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, that is the illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has resulted in thousands of cases in Australia since 25 January 2020 when the first case was diagnosed. This emerging virus presents particular hazards to researchers and laboratory staff in a clinical setting, highlighted by rapid and widespread global transmission. Based on the epidemiological and clinical data that have become available in mid-2020, we propose the interim classification of SARS-CoV-2 as a Risk Group 3 organism is reasonable, and discuss establishing Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3) regulations accordingly. Despite its global spread, the reported mortality rate of SARS-CoV-2 ranging from 0.13% to 6.22% is considerably less than that of other Risk Group 4 agents including Ebola and Marburg viruses with fatality rates as high as 90%. In addition, studies have demonstrated that approximately 86% of patients presenting with severe courses of the disease are aged 70 years or above, with the presence of comorbid conditions such as cardiovascular and respiratory system diseases in the majority of all fatal cases. In contrary to recent discussions surrounding the protective and administrative measures needed in a laboratory, the emerging evidence surrounding mortality rate, distinct demographics of severe infections, and the presence of underlying diseases does not justify the categorisation of SARS-CoV-2 as a Risk Group 4 organism. This article summarises biosafety precautions, control measures and appropriate physical containment facilities required to minimise the risk of laboratory-acquired infections with SARS-CoV-2.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Occupational Exposure / Containment of Biohazards / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Laboratories Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: Pathology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Occupational Exposure / Containment of Biohazards / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Laboratories Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: Pathology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article