Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Rapid Validation of Whole-Slide Imaging for Primary Histopathology Diagnosis.
Samuelson, Megan I; Chen, Stephanie J; Boukhar, Sarag A; Schnieders, Eric M; Walhof, Mackenzie L; Bellizzi, Andrew M; Robinson, Robert A; Rajan K D, Anand.
  • Samuelson MI; Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Chen SJ; Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Boukhar SA; Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Schnieders EM; Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Walhof ML; Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Bellizzi AM; Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Robinson RA; Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Rajan K D A; Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 155(5): 638-648, 2021 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1207251
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The ongoing global severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic necessitates adaptations in the practice of surgical pathology at scale. Primary diagnosis by whole-slide imaging (WSI) is a key component that would aid departments in providing uninterrupted histopathology diagnosis and maintaining revenue streams from disruption. We sought to perform rapid validation of the use of WSI in primary diagnosis meeting recommendations of the College of American Pathologists guidelines.

METHODS:

Glass slides from clinically reported cases from 5 participating pathologists with a preset washout period were digitally scanned and reviewed in settings identical to typical reporting. Cases were classified as concordant or with minor or major disagreement with the original diagnosis. Randomized subsampling was performed, and mean concordance rates were calculated.

RESULTS:

In total, 171 cases were included and distributed equally among participants. For the group as a whole, the mean concordance rate in sampled cases (n = 90) was 83.6% counting all discrepancies and 94.6% counting only major disagreements. The mean pathologist concordance rate in sampled cases (n = 18) ranged from 90.49% to 97%.

CONCLUSIONS:

We describe a novel double-blinded method for rapid validation of WSI for primary diagnosis. Our findings highlight the occurrence of a range of diagnostic reproducibility when deploying digital methods.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pathology, Surgical / Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Telepathology Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ajcp

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pathology, Surgical / Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Telepathology Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ajcp