Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Critical Ethics: How to Balance Patient Autonomy With Fairness When Patients Refuse Coronavirus Disease 2019 Testing.
Kopar, Piroska K; Kramer, Jessica B; Brown, Douglas E; Bochicchio, Grant V.
  • Kopar PK; All authors: Department of Surgery, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO.
  • Kramer JB; All authors: Department of Surgery, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO.
  • Brown DE; All authors: Department of Surgery, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO.
  • Bochicchio GV; All authors: Department of Surgery, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO.
Crit Care Explor ; 3(1): e0326, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1057889
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

A cornerstone of our healthcare system's response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is widespread testing to facilitate both isolation and early treatment. When patients refuse to undergo coronavirus disease testing, they compromise not only just their own health but also the health of those around them. The primary objective of our review is to identify the most ethical way a given healthcare system may respond to a patient's refusal to undergo coronavirus disease 2019 testing. DATA SOURCES We apply a systematic approach to a true clinical case scenario to evaluate the ethical merits of four plausible responses to a patient's refusal to undergo coronavirus disease testing. Although our clinical case is anecdotal, it is representative of our experience at our University Tertiary Care Center. DATA EXTRACTION Each plausible response in the case is rigorously analyzed by examining relevant stakeholders, facts, norms, and ethical weight both with respect to individuals' rights and to the interests of public health. We use the "So Far No Objections" method as the ethical approach of choice because it has been widely used in the Ethics Modules of the Surgical Council on Resident Education Curriculum of the American College of Surgeons. DATA

SYNTHESIS:

Two ethically viable options may be tailored to individual circumstances depending on the severity of the patient's condition. Although unstable patients must be assumed to be coronavirus disease positive and treated accordingly even in the absence of a test, stable patients who refuse testing may rightfully be asked to seek care elsewhere.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although patient autonomy is a fundamental principle of our society's medical ethic, during a pandemic we must, in the interest of vulnerable and critically ill patients, draw certain limits to obliging the preferences of noncritically ill patients with decisional capacity.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: Crit Care Explor Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: CCE.0000000000000326

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: Crit Care Explor Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: CCE.0000000000000326