Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in COVID-19 patients: A proportional prevalence meta-analysis.
Mir, Tanveer; Sattar, Yasar; Ahmad, Javeed; Ullah, Waqas; Shanah, Layla; Alraies, M Chadi; Qureshi, Waqas T.
  • Mir T; Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  • Sattar Y; Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Elmhurst Hospital, Queens, New York, New York, USA.
  • Ahmad J; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Ullah W; Abington Jefferson Health, Abington, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Shanah L; Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  • Alraies MC; Cardiovascular Institute, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  • Qureshi WT; University of Massachusetts School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 99(1): 1-8, 2022 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1064331
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Limited epidemiological data are available on the outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) in COVID-19 patients.

METHODS:

We performed literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Ovid to identify research articles that studied outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in COVID-19 patients. The primary outcome was survival at discharge. Secondary outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and types of cardiac arrest. Pooled percentages with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for the prevalence of outcomes.

RESULTS:

A total of 7,891 COVID patients were included in the study. There were 621 (pooled prevalence 8%, 95% CI 4-13%) cardiac arrest patients. There were 52 (pooled prevalence 3.0%; 95% CI 0.0-10.0%) patients that survived at the time of discharge. ROSC was achieved in 202 (pooled prevalence 39%;95% CI 21.0-59.0%) patients. Mean time to ROSC was 7.74 (95% CI 7.51-7.98) min. The commonest rhythm at the time of cardiac arrest was pulseless electrical activity (pooled prevalence 46%; 95% 13-80%), followed by asystole (pooled prevalence 40%; 95% CI 6-80%). Unstable ventricular arrhythmia occurred in a minority of patients (pooled prevalence 8%; 95% CI 4-13%).

CONCLUSION:

This pooled analysis of studies showed that the survival post in-hospital cardiac arrest in COVID patients is dismal despite adequate ROSC obtained at the time of resuscitation. Nonshockable rhythm cardiac arrest is commoner suggesting a non-cardiac cause while cardiac related etiology is uncommon. Future studies are needed to improve the survival in these patients.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / COVID-19 / Heart Arrest Type of study: Diagnostic study / Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Journal subject: Cardiology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ccd.29525

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / COVID-19 / Heart Arrest Type of study: Diagnostic study / Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Journal subject: Cardiology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ccd.29525