Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Routine saliva testing for the identification of silent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in healthcare workers.
Zhang, Kevin; Shoukat, Affan; Crystal, William; Langley, Joanne M; Galvani, Alison P; Moghadas, Seyed M.
  • Zhang K; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Shoukat A; Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis (CIDMA), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States.
  • Crystal W; Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis (CIDMA), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States.
  • Langley JM; Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
  • Galvani AP; Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis (CIDMA), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States.
  • Moghadas SM; Agent-Based Modelling Laboratory, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(10): 1189-1193, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1065721
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Current COVID-19 guidelines recommend symptom-based screening and regular nasopharyngeal (NP) testing for healthcare personnel in high-risk settings. We sought to estimate case detection percentages with various routine NP and saliva testing frequencies.

DESIGN:

Simulation modeling study.

METHODS:

We constructed a sensitivity function based on the average infectiousness profile of symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases to determine the probability of being identified at the time of testing. This function was fitted to reported data on the percent positivity of symptomatic COVID-19 patients using NP testing. We then simulated a routine testing program with different NP and saliva testing frequencies to determine case detection percentages during the infectious period, as well as the presymptomatic stage.

RESULTS:

Routine biweekly NP testing, once every 2 weeks, identified an average of 90.7% (SD, 0.18) of cases during the infectious period and 19.7% (SD, 0.98) during the presymptomatic stage. With a weekly NP testing frequency, the corresponding case detection percentages were 95.9% (SD, 0.18) and 32.9% (SD, 1.23), respectively. A 5-day saliva testing schedule had a similar case detection percentage as weekly NP testing during the infectious period, but identified ~10% more cases (mean, 42.5%; SD, 1.10) during the presymptomatic stage.

CONCLUSION:

Our findings highlight the utility of routine noninvasive saliva testing for frontline healthcare workers to protect vulnerable patient populations. A 5-day saliva testing schedule should be considered to help identify silent infections and prevent outbreaks in nursing homes and healthcare facilities.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Saliva / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Journal subject: Communicable Diseases / Nursing / Epidemiology / Hospitals Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ice.2020.1413

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Saliva / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Journal subject: Communicable Diseases / Nursing / Epidemiology / Hospitals Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ice.2020.1413