Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Missing clinical trial data: the evidence gap in primary data for potential COVID-19 drugs.
Rodgers, Florence; Pepperrell, Toby; Keestra, Sarai; Pilkington, Victoria.
  • Rodgers F; School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. florence.rodgers15@imperial.ac.uk.
  • Pepperrell T; School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Keestra S; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Pilkington V; Department of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Trials ; 22(1): 59, 2021 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1067259
Preprint
This scientific journal article is probably based on a previously available preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See preprint
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Several drugs are being repurposed for the treatment of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic based on in vitro or early clinical findings. As these drugs are being used in varied regimens and dosages, it is important to enable synthesis of existing safety data from clinical trials. However, availability of safety information is limited by a lack of timely reporting of overall clinical trial results on public registries or through academic publication. We aimed to analyse the evidence gap in this data by conducting a rapid review of results posting on ClinicalTrials.gov and in academic publications to quantify the number of trials missing results for drugs potentially being repurposed for COVID-19.

METHODS:

ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for 19 drugs that have been identified as potential treatments for COVID-19. Relevant clinical trials for any prior indication were listed by identifier (NCT number) and checked for results and for timely result reporting (within 395 days of the primary completion date). Additionally, PubMed and Google Scholar were searched to identify publications of results not listed on the registry. A second, blinded search of 10% of trials was conducted to assess reviewer concordance.

RESULTS:

Of 3754 completed trials, 1516 (40.4%) did not post results on ClinicalTrials.gov or in the academic literature. Tabular results were available on ClinicalTrials.gov for 1172 (31.2%) completed trials. A further 1066 (28.4%) had published results in the academic literature, but did not report results on ClinicalTrials.gov . Key drugs missing clinical trial results include hydroxychloroquine (37.0% completed trials unreported), favipiravir (77.8%) and lopinavir (40.5%).

CONCLUSIONS:

There is an important evidence gap for the safety of drugs being repurposed for COVID-19. This uncertainty could cause unnecessary additional morbidity and mortality during the pandemic. We recommend caution in experimental drug use for non-severe disease and urge clinical trial sponsors to report missing results retrospectively.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Antiviral Agents / Registries / Clinical Trials as Topic / Enzyme Inhibitors / Research Report / COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Trials Journal subject: Medicine / Therapeutics Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S13063-021-05024-y

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Antiviral Agents / Registries / Clinical Trials as Topic / Enzyme Inhibitors / Research Report / COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Trials Journal subject: Medicine / Therapeutics Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S13063-021-05024-y