Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Social distancing policies in 22 African countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a desk review.
Verani, Andre; Clodfelter, Catherine; Menon, Akshara Narayan; Chevinsky, Jennifer; Victory, Kerton; Hakim, Avi.
  • Verani A; U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.
  • Clodfelter C; U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.
  • Menon AN; U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.
  • Chevinsky J; U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.
  • Victory K; U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.
  • Hakim A; U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.
Pan Afr Med J ; 37(Suppl 1): 46, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1069979
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

on January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the novel coronavirus outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. As of October 5, 2020, there were over 34.8 million reported cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and more than 1 million reported deaths from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), globally. Non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as social distancing policies, hand hygiene, and mask use, are key public health measures to control COVID-19. In response to, or in some cases even before, the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 infections were reported in their countries, policy makers across Africa issued various social distancing policies.

METHODS:

we describe social distancing policies issued from March 1 to April 24, 2020 in 22 Anglophone countries of sub-Saharan Africa. We reviewed policies identified online.

RESULTS:

though all 22 countries closed schools and banned gatherings, they took a variety of approaches to sizes of gatherings banned and to stay-at-home orders, with 13 countries issuing national stay-at-home orders, four issuing subnational stay-at-home orders, and five not issuing stay-at-home orders. Enforcement provisions varied by country, as did funeral and health care exceptions.

CONCLUSION:

movement restrictions, business restrictions, and school closures can have substantial negative impacts on economies, education, nutrition, and routine health care. Yet easing or lifting of COVID-19 social distancing policies can lead to increased transmission. Our review documents a wide variety of policy alternatives used in Africa and can inform future adjustments as countries ease, lift, and reapply measures in response to their evolving epidemics.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physical Distancing / COVID-19 / Health Policy Type of study: Observational study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Journal: Pan Afr Med J Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Pamj.supp.2020.37.46.27026

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physical Distancing / COVID-19 / Health Policy Type of study: Observational study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Journal: Pan Afr Med J Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Pamj.supp.2020.37.46.27026