Your browser doesn't support javascript.
[Cross-sectional study of COVID-19 patients on working conditions and quality of care]. / Querschnittsstudie zu Arbeitsbedingungen und Versorgungsqualität in der Versorgung von COVID-19-Patienten.
Kaltwasser, Arnold; Pelz, Sabrina; Nydahl, Peter; Dubb, Rolf; Borzikowsky, Christoph.
  • Kaltwasser A; Akademie der Kreiskliniken Reutlingen GmbH, Reutlingen, Deutschland. kaltwasser_a@klin-rt.de.
  • Pelz S; BG Klinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland.
  • Nydahl P; Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland.
  • Dubb R; Akademie der Kreiskliniken Reutlingen GmbH, Reutlingen, Deutschland.
  • Borzikowsky C; Institut für Medizinische Informatik und Statistik, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland.
Anaesthesist ; 70(9): 753-760, 2021 09.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1074379
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The COVID-19 pandemic challenges hospital clinicians by additional burdens. Key questions are whether hospital clinicians have experienced more stress in the care of COVID-19 patients and whether patient safety and quality of care have changed.

METHODS:

Cross-sectional study using an online survey with clinicians in German hospitals on working conditions and quality of care during the COVID-19 pandemic, comparing clinicians with (MmK) vs. without direct contact (MoK) to COVID-19 patients.

RESULTS:

In total, 2122 clinicians participated. Most clinicians were physicians (15.4%, n = 301) or nurses (77.0%, n = 1505) working in major acute care hospitals (46.0%, n = 899). Every second respondent stated that they worked more than usual (46.4%, n = 907) and took on additional activities (47.7%, n = 932). A quarter of the participants did not receive any training or get instructions in devices (21.5%, n = 421). Only 51.5% (n = 1006) of the respondents were provided with sufficient personal protective equipment. More than 30% (32.7%, n = 639) were more satisfied than usual. The comparing clinicans with vs. without direkt contact to Covid-19 patients worked more shifts than usual (> 2 shifts 24.1%, n = 306 vs. 13.7%, n = 63, p < 0.001) and without instruction (27.9%, n = 364 vs. 17.1%), n = 57, p < 0.001). In terms of patient safety, there were more deficiencies in the care, mechanical ventilation and nursing (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

The cross-sectional study indicates an increased burden on clinicians and a restricted quality of care for patients with COVID-19. A risk to patients or clinicians cannot be excluded.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Health Care / Pandemics / Patient Safety / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: German Journal: Anaesthesist Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Health Care / Pandemics / Patient Safety / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: German Journal: Anaesthesist Year: 2021 Document Type: Article