Your browser doesn't support javascript.
SARS-CoV-2 transmission during rugby league matches: do players become infected after participating with SARS-CoV-2 positive players?
Jones, Ben; Phillips, Gemma; Kemp, Simon; Payne, Brendan; Hart, Brian; Cross, Matthew; Stokes, Keith A.
  • Jones B; Carnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) centre, Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK B.Jones@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.
  • Phillips G; England Performance Unit, Rugby Football League, Leeds, UK.
  • Kemp S; Leeds Rhinos Rugby League club, Leeds, UK.
  • Payne B; Division of Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town and the Sports Science Institute of South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Hart B; School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Cross M; Carnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) centre, Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
  • Stokes KA; England Performance Unit, Rugby Football League, Leeds, UK.
Br J Sports Med ; 55(14): 807-813, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1388482
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To examine the interactions between SARS-CoV-2 positive players and other players during rugby league matches and determine within-match SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk.

METHODS:

Four Super League matches in which SARS-CoV-2 positive players were subsequently found to have participated were analysed. Players were identified as increased-risk contacts, and player interactions and proximities were analysed by video footage and global positioning system (GPS) data. The primary outcome was new positive cases of SARS-CoV-2 within 14 days of the match in increased-risk contacts and other players participating in the matches.

RESULTS:

Out of 136 total players, there were 8 SARS-CoV-2 positive players, 28 players identified as increased-risk contacts and 100 other players in the matches. Increased-risk contacts and other players were involved in 11.4±9.0 (maximum 32) and 4.0±5.2 (maximum 23) tackles, respectively. From GPS data, increased-risk contacts and other players were within 2 m of SARS-CoV-2 positive players on 10.4±18.0 (maximum 88) and 12.5±20.7 (maximum 121) occasions, totalling 65.7±137.7 (maximum 689) and 89.5±169.4 (maximum 1003) s, respectively. Within 14 days of the match, one increased-risk contact and five players returned positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) tests, and 27 increased-risk contacts and 95 other participants returned negative SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests. Positive cases were most likely traced to social interactions, car sharing and wider community transmission and not linked to in-match transmission.

CONCLUSION:

Despite tackle involvements and close proximity interactions with SARS-CoV-2 positive players, in-match SARS-CoV-2 transmission was not confirmed. While larger datasets are needed, these findings suggest rugby presents a lower risk of viral transmission than previously predicted.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Competitive Behavior / Athletic Performance / Football / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Br J Sports Med Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: BJSPORTS-2020-103714

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Competitive Behavior / Athletic Performance / Football / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Br J Sports Med Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: BJSPORTS-2020-103714