Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Evaluation of rapid antigen detection kit from the WHO Emergency Use List for detecting SARS-CoV-2.
Mak, Gannon C K; Lau, Stephen S Y; Wong, Kitty K Y; Chow, Nancy L S; Lau, C S; Lam, Edman T K; Chan, Rickjason C W; Tsang, Dominic N C.
  • Mak GCK; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Electronic address: so_phls10@dh.gov.hk.
  • Lau SSY; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
  • Wong KKY; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
  • Chow NLS; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
  • Lau CS; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
  • Lam ETK; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
  • Chan RCW; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
  • Tsang DNC; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
J Clin Virol ; 134: 104712, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1082743
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Currently, there are two rapid antigen detection (RAD) kits from the WHO Emergency Use List for detecting SARS-CoV-2.

OBJECTIVE:

The Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device was selected to evaluate the performance for detecting SARS-CoV-2. STUDY

DESIGN:

Analytical sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus was determined by limit of detection (LOD) using RT-PCR as a reference method. Clinical sensitivity was evaluated by using respiratory specimens collected from confirmed COVID-19 patients.

RESULTS:

The LOD results showed that the RAD kit was 100 fold less sensitive than RT-PCR. Clinical sensitivity of the RAD kit was 68.6 % for detecting specimens from COVID-19 patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

The RAD kit evaluated in the present study shared similar performance with another kit from the WHO Emergency Use List, the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag. Understanding the clinical characteristics of RAD kits can guide us to decide different testing strategies in different settings.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Reagent Kits, Diagnostic / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Antigens, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: J Clin Virol Journal subject: Virology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Reagent Kits, Diagnostic / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Antigens, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: J Clin Virol Journal subject: Virology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article