Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Validation of the GeneXpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 PCR assay using saliva as biological specimen.
Vaz, Sara Nunes; Santana, Daniele Souza de; Netto, Eduardo Martins; Wang, Wei-Kung; Brites, Carlos.
  • Vaz SN; Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos (HUPES), Laboratório de Pesquisa em Infectologia (LAPI), Salvador, BA, Brazil. Electronic address: saranunes02@hotmail.com.
  • Santana DS; Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos (HUPES), Laboratório de Pesquisa em Infectologia (LAPI), Salvador, BA, Brazil. Electronic address: dnssan@hotmail.com.
  • Netto EM; Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos (HUPES), Laboratório de Pesquisa em Infectologia (LAPI), Salvador, BA, Brazil. Electronic address: nettoeduardom@hotmail.com.
  • Wang WK; University of Hawaii at Manoa (UH Manoa), Department of Tropical Medicine, Medical Microbiology and Pharmacology, HI, USA. Electronic address: wangwk@hawaii.edu.
  • Brites C; Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos (HUPES), Laboratório de Pesquisa em Infectologia (LAPI), Salvador, BA, Brazil. Electronic address: crbrites@gmail.com.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 25(2): 101543, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1084394
ABSTRACT
In the pandemic, rapid and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial in controlling the outbreak. Recent studies have shown a high detection rate using saliva/oral fluids as specimens for laboratory detection of the virus. We intended to evaluate the test performance of the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 cartridge assay in comparison to a conventional qRT-PCR testing, using saliva as biological specimen. Forty saliva samples from symptomatic participants were collected. Conventional qRT-PCR was performed for amplification of E and RdRp genes and the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay amplified E and N2 genes. In the conventional assay, the median cycle threshold value of the E gene was 34.9, and of the RdRp gene was 38.3. In the Xpert Xpress assay, the median cycle threshold value of the E gene was 29.7, and of the N2 gene was 31.6. These results can allow a broaden use of molecular tests for management of COVID-19 pandemic, especially in resources-limited settings.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Braz J Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Braz J Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2021 Document Type: Article