Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Risk awareness during operation of analytical flow cytometers and implications throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Aspland, Avrill; Chew, Claude; Douagi, Iyadh; Galland, Tessa; Marvin, James; Monts, Josh; Nance, Dayton; Smith, Adrian L; Solga, Michael.
  • Aspland A; Sydney Cytometry Core Research Facility, Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Chew C; Flow Cytometry Core Facility, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
  • Douagi I; Flow Cytometry Section, Research Technologies Branch, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Galland T; Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Health Science Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Marvin J; Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Health Science Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Monts J; Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Health Science Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Nance D; Flow Cytometry Section, Research Technologies Branch, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Smith AL; Sydney Cytometry Core Research Facility, Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Solga M; Flow Cytometry Core Facility, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Cytometry A ; 99(1): 81-89, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1086343
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought biosafety to the forefront of many life sciences. The outbreak has compelled research institutions to re-evaluate biosafety practices and potential at-risk areas within research laboratories and more specifically within Shared Resource Laboratories (SRLs). In flow cytometry facilities, biological safety assessment encompasses known hazards based on the biological sample and associated risk group, as well as potential or unknown hazards, such as aerosol generation and instrument "failure modes." Cell sorting procedures undergo clearly defined biological safety assessments and adhere to well-established biosafety guidelines that help to protect SRL staff and users against aerosol exposure. Conversely, benchtop analyzers are considered low risk due to their low sample pressure and enclosed fluidic systems, although there is little empirical evidence to support this assumption of low risk. To investigate this, we evaluated several regions on analyzers using the Cyclex-d microsphere assay, a recently established method for cell sorter aerosol containment testing. We found that aerosol and/or droplet hazards were detected on all benchtop analyzers predominantly during operation in "failure modes." These results indicate that benchtop analytical cytometers present a more complicated set of risks than are commonly appreciated.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cell Separation / Equipment Contamination / Occupational Exposure / Occupational Health / Containment of Biohazards / Laboratory Personnel / Flow Cytometry / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Cytometry A Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cyto.a.24282

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cell Separation / Equipment Contamination / Occupational Exposure / Occupational Health / Containment of Biohazards / Laboratory Personnel / Flow Cytometry / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Cytometry A Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cyto.a.24282