Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Covid-19 shelter-at-home and work, lifestyle and well-being in desk workers.
Barone Gibbs, B; Kline, C E; Huber, K A; Paley, J L; Perera, S.
  • Barone Gibbs B; Department of Health and Human Development, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Kline CE; Department of Health and Human Development, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Huber KA; Department of Health and Human Development, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Paley JL; Department of Health and Human Development, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Perera S; Departments of Medicine and Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 71(2): 86-94, 2021 04 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1087789
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Emerging cross-sectional reports find that the COVID-19 pandemic and related social restrictions negatively affect lifestyle behaviours and mental health in general populations.

AIMS:

To study the longitudinal impact of COVID-19 on work practices, lifestyle and well-being among desk workers during shelter-at-home restrictions.

METHODS:

We added follow-up after completion of a clinical trial among desk workers to longitudinally measure sedentary behaviour, physical activity, sleep, diet, mood, quality of life and work-related health using validated questionnaires and surveys. We compared outcomes assessed before and during COVID-19 shelter-at-home restrictions. We assessed whether changes in outcomes differed by remote working status (always, changed to or never remote) using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).

RESULTS:

Participants (N = 112; 69% female; mean (SD) age = 45.4 (12.3) years; follow-up = 13.5 (6.8) months) had substantial changes to work practices, including 72% changing to remote work. Deleterious changes from before to during shelter-at-home included 1.3 (3.5)-h increase in non-workday sedentary behaviour; 0.7 (2.8)-point worsening of sleep quality; 8.5 (21.2)-point increase in mood disturbance; reductions in five of eight quality of life subscales; 0.5 (1.1)-point decrease in work-related health (P < 0.05). Other outcomes, including diet, physical activity and workday sedentary behaviour, remained stable (P ≥ 0.05). Workers who were remote before and during the pandemic had greater increases in non-workday sedentary behaviour and stress, with greater declines in physical functioning. Wake time was delayed overall by 41 (61) min, and more so in workers who changed to remote.

CONCLUSIONS:

Employers should consider supporting healthy lifestyle and well-being among desk workers during pandemic-related social restrictions, regardless of remote working status.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Work / Communicable Disease Control / Pandemics / COVID-19 / Life Style / Occupations Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Occup Med (Lond) Journal subject: Occupational Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Occmed

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Work / Communicable Disease Control / Pandemics / COVID-19 / Life Style / Occupations Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Occup Med (Lond) Journal subject: Occupational Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Occmed