Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Effectiveness of interventions to reduce COVID-19 transmission in a large urban jail: a model-based analysis.
Malloy, Giovanni S P; Puglisi, Lisa; Brandeau, Margaret L; Harvey, Tyler D; Wang, Emily A.
  • Malloy GSP; Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA malloyg@stanford.edu.
  • Puglisi L; Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Brandeau ML; Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities and Education Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Harvey TD; Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Wang EA; SEICHE Center for Health and Justice, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
BMJ Open ; 11(2): e042898, 2021 02 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1088253
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

We aim to estimate the impact of various mitigation strategies on COVID-19 transmission in a US jail beyond those offered in national guidelines.

DESIGN:

We developed a stochastic dynamic transmission model of COVID-19.

SETTING:

One anonymous large urban US jail.

PARTICIPANTS:

Several thousand staff and incarcerated individuals.

INTERVENTIONS:

There were four intervention phases during the outbreak the start of the outbreak, depopulation of the jail, increased proportion of people in single cells and asymptomatic testing. These interventions were implemented incrementally and in concert with one another. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME

MEASURES:

The basic reproduction ratio, R0 , in each phase, as estimated using the next generation method. The fraction of new cases, hospitalisations and deaths averted by these interventions (along with the standard measures of sanitisation, masking and social distancing interventions).

RESULTS:

For the first outbreak phase, the estimated R0 was 8.44 (95% credible interval (CrI) 5.00 to 13.10), and for the subsequent phases, R0,phase 2 =3.64 (95% CrI 2.43 to 5.11), R0,phase 3 =1.72 (95% CrI 1.40 to 2.12) and R0,phase 4 =0.58 (95% CrI 0.43 to 0.75). In total, the jail's interventions prevented approximately 83% of projected cases, hospitalisations and deaths over 83 days.

CONCLUSIONS:

Depopulation, single celling and asymptomatic testing within jails can be effective strategies to mitigate COVID-19 transmission in addition to standard public health measures. Decision makers should prioritise reductions in the jail population, single celling and testing asymptomatic populations as additional measures to manage COVID-19 within correctional settings.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Disease Outbreaks / Jails / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2020-042898

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Disease Outbreaks / Jails / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2020-042898