Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Did COVID-19 change the interventions provided by oncology social workers in the epicenter of the pandemic? A natural experiment.
Snow, Alison; Handsman, Sarah; Lawton, Brittany; Burruss, Karen; Oktay, Julianne S.
  • Snow A; The Blavatnik Family - Chelsea Medical Center at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
  • Handsman S; The Blavatnik Family - Chelsea Medical Center at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
  • Lawton B; Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Burruss K; University of Maryland School of Social Work, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Oktay JS; University of Maryland School of Social Work, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Psychosoc Oncol ; 39(3): 469-478, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1091378
ABSTRACT

Background:

Throughout history, the field of medical social work has been shaped by epidemics and pandemics. As COVID-19 rapidly overwhelmed the healthcare system in 2020, oncology departments found that space, staff, and funds were reallocated to address patient needs during the pandemic. Traditional outpatient services were required to operate with reduced resources, with special attention to additional measures to protect workers and patients from exposure to the virus. Little is known about how these changes affected the nature of the practice of oncology social work.

Methods:

We compared data on OSW interventions for three months (March-May) 2019 to the same period in 2020. Mount Sinai Downtown Cancer Center's Department of Social Work routinely collects data on services provided by social workers using a validated instrument. As NYC became the epicenter of the COVID-19 in March 2020, the comparison of these time periods creates a natural experiment to examine whether and how the presence of the virus impacted the services provided by OSWs.

Findings:

There was little difference in the number of encounters that took place between the two time periods (2186 encounters in 2019 and 2084 encounters in 2020); however, there were notable differences in the types of interventions. While interventions involving supportive counseling decreased in 2020, we identified a significant increase specific to bereavement counseling.

Conclusion:

The study shows a remarkable consistency in the volume and types of services provided by OSWs, in spite of the radical increase in stressors they experienced during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings suggest that the OSWs did not allow these stressors to interfere with their work with patients. This study demonstrates how routine use of an instrument to measure OSW interventions can be used to examine services provided over time and to evaluate potential influences of external factors.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Social Work / Social Workers / Occupational Stress / Psychosocial Intervention / COVID-19 / Neoplasms Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: J Psychosoc Oncol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 07347332.2021.1884635

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Social Work / Social Workers / Occupational Stress / Psychosocial Intervention / COVID-19 / Neoplasms Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: J Psychosoc Oncol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 07347332.2021.1884635