Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Negative-Pressure Isolation Mask for Endoscopic Examination During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Gao, Yuan; Xie, Jia; Ye, Lian-Song; Du, Jiang; Zhang, Qiong-Ying; Hu, Bing.
  • Gao Y; Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Xie J; Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Ye LS; Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Du J; Department of Endoscopy Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Zhang QY; Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Hu B; Department of Endoscopy Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol ; 12(2): e00314, 2021 02 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1097482
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, endoscopists have high risks of exposure to exhaled air from patients during gastroscopy. To minimize this risk, we transformed the oxygen mask into a fully closed negative-pressure gastroscope isolation mask. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of use of this mask during gastroscopy.

METHODS:

From February 28, 2020, to March 10, 2020, 320 patients undergoing gastroscopy were randomly assigned into the mask group (n = 160) or conventional group (n = 160). Patients in the mask group wore the isolation mask during gastroscopy, whereas patients in the conventional group did not wear the mask. The adenosine triphosphate fluorescence and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in patients' exhaled air were measured to reflect the degree of environmental pollution by exhaled air. Patients' vital signs, operation time, and adverse events during endoscopy were also evaluated.

RESULTS:

Four patients were excluded because of noncooperation or incomplete data. A total of 316 patients were included in the final analysis. The difference between the highest CO2 concentration around patients' mouth and CO2 concentration in the environment was significantly decreased in the mask group compared with the conventional group. There was no significant difference in the adenosine triphosphate fluorescence, vital signs, and operation time between the 2 groups. No severe adverse events related to the isolation mask, endoscopy failure, or new coronavirus infection during follow-up were recorded.

DISCUSSION:

This new isolation mask showed excellent feasibility of use and safety compared with routine gastroscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Isolators / Gastroscopy / COVID-19 / Masks Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Clin Transl Gastroenterol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ctg.0000000000000314

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Isolators / Gastroscopy / COVID-19 / Masks Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Clin Transl Gastroenterol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ctg.0000000000000314