Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Associations of working from home with occupational physical activity and sedentary behavior under the COVID-19 pandemic.
Fukushima, Noritoshi; Machida, Masaki; Kikuchi, Hiroyuki; Amagasa, Shiho; Hayashi, Toshio; Odagiri, Yuko; Takamiya, Tomoko; Inoue, Shigeru.
  • Fukushima N; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Machida M; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kikuchi H; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Amagasa S; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Hayashi T; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Odagiri Y; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Takamiya T; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Inoue S; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
J Occup Health ; 63(1): e12212, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1120115
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To compare physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) levels during work time between those who work from home (WFH) and at workplaces (no WFH), and by WFH subgroups.

METHODS:

This cross-sectional internet-based survey included 1239 workers (mean age [standard deviation], 44.7 [13.7] years; 59.2% men) living in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area. Time spent sitting (SB), standing (light-intensity PA; LPA), walking, and engaging in heavy labor (moderate-to-vigorous PA; MVPA) during work time was measured using the Work-related Physical Activity Questionnaire. Workers reported weekly WFH percentages (eg, 0% implies no WFH and 100% implies full WFH), and WFH percentages were categorized into no WFH (0% WFH) and WFH (1%-100% WFH) groups. The WFH group was further subcategorized into 1%-25%, 26%-50%, 51%-75%, and 76%-100% subgroups.

RESULTS:

Overall, 494 workers (39.9%) worked from home. During working hours, SB time was longer in the WFH group than in the no WFH group (mean minutes [% working-time SB] 335.7 vs 224.7 min [74% vs 50%]). Significantly shorter LPA and MVPA times (%) were reported in the WFH group than in the no WFH group (LPA, 59.6 vs 122.9 min [14% vs 29%]; MVPA, 55.3 vs 91.9 min [13% vs 22%], all P < .001). Among the WFH subgroups, longer SB time and shorter LPA and MVPA times were observed in the highest WFH group (WFH 76%-100%) than in the WFH 1%-25% and 26%-50% subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Workers who telecommuted were less physically active and had longer sedentary during work time than those who worked at the workplaces.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Exercise / Workplace / Sedentary Behavior / Teleworking / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: J Occup Health Journal subject: Occupational Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 1348-9585.12212

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Exercise / Workplace / Sedentary Behavior / Teleworking / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: J Occup Health Journal subject: Occupational Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 1348-9585.12212