Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Head-to-head comparison of two rapid high-throughput automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassays targeting total antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and spike protein receptor binding domain.
Poljak, Mario; Ostrbenk Valencak, Anja; Stamol, Tina; Seme, Katja.
  • Poljak M; Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloska 4, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Electronic address: mario.poljak@mf.uni-lj.si.
  • Ostrbenk Valencak A; Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloska 4, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Stamol T; Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloska 4, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Seme K; Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloska 4, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
J Clin Virol ; 137: 104784, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1122967
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Accurate anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays are needed to inform diagnostic, therapeutic, and public health decisions. The first manufacturer-independent head-to-head comparison of two rapid high-throughput automated electrochemiluminescence double-antigen sandwich immunoassays targeting total anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against two different viral proteins, Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Elecsys-N) and Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (Elecsys-S) (Roche Diagnostics), was performed in a routine setting during the exponential growth phase of the epidemic's second wave.

METHODS:

The diagnostic specificity of Elecsys-N and Elecsys-S was initially evaluated on a panel of 572 pre-COVID-19 samples, showing 100 % specificity of both assays. Elecsys-N/Elecsys-S head-to-head comparison used 3,416 consecutive blood samples from individuals that were tested for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 within commercial out-of-pocket serologic testing.

RESULTS:

Elecsys-N/Elecsys-S head-to-head comparison showed overall agreement of 98.68 % (3,371/3,416; 95 % CI, 98.23-99.03 %), positive agreement of 95.16 % (884/929; 95 % CI, 93.52-96.41 %), and a high kappa value of 0.996 (95 % CI, 0.956-0.976). Previous SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity was identified in 14/24 (58.3 %) Elecsys-N negative/Elecsys-S positive individuals and in 4/21 (19.0 %) Elecsys-N positive/Elecsys-S negative individuals.

CONCLUSION:

The first Elecsys-N/Elecsys-S head-to-head comparison showed excellent agreement of two highly specific and rapid high-throughput automated anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays. An important question is whether laboratories offering two different antibody assays could benefit from combining the assays; if so, should use be concomitant or sequential-and, in the latter case, in which order? Based on our results, we favor concomitant over sequential Elecsys-N/Elecsys-S use when testing individuals for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in high-incidence settings; for example, during the exponential or stationary growth phase of the COVID-19 epidemic.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: High-Throughput Screening Assays / Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus / COVID-19 Serological Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Antibodies, Viral / Nucleoproteins Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Clin Virol Journal subject: Virology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: High-Throughput Screening Assays / Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus / COVID-19 Serological Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Antibodies, Viral / Nucleoproteins Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Clin Virol Journal subject: Virology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article