Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The protease inhibitor lopinavir, boosted with ritonavir, as treatment for COVID-19: a rapid review.
Dorward, Jienchi; Gbinigie, Oghenekome; Cai, Ting; Roberts, Nia W; Garrett, Nigel; Hayward, Gail; Butler, Christopher C.
  • Dorward J; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Gbinigie O; Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
  • Cai T; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Roberts NW; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Garrett N; Outreach Librarian Knowledge Centre, Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Hayward G; Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
  • Butler CC; Discipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Antivir Ther ; 25(7): 365-376, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1128073
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The HIV protease inhibitor lopinavir, boosted with ritonavir, has been used off-label to treat COVID-19. We aimed to synthesize the clinical evidence for lopinavir/ritonavir as a treatment for COVID-19.

METHODS:

We performed a rapid review by searching databases including PubMed, GoogleScholar, medRxiv, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, for COVID-19 studies comparing outcomes between patients who did and did not receive lopinavir/ritonavir. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria.

RESULTS:

We identified five completed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 14 retrospective cohort studies. Two large RCTs of 5,040 and 2,771 hospitalized adults with COVID-19 found no evidence that lopinavir/ritonavir influenced the primary outcome of mortality, or secondary outcomes including progression to mechanical ventilation or time to discharge. Results remained similar in all sub-group analyses including by age, gender, baseline ventilation and time since symptom onset. The three smaller RCTs (n=86-199) also found no evidence of a benefit in the primary outcomes of time to clinical improvement or time to viral clearance. The 14 observational studies included between 50 and 415 participants, and were limited by a lack of adjustment for potential confounding variables. The majority of these studies found no evidence that lopinavir/ritonavir was associated with improved mortality or other clinical outcomes, although results regarding viral clearance were mixed.

CONCLUSIONS:

Good evidence from large clinical trials does not support using lopinavir/ritonavir to treat COVID-19 amongst hospitalized patients.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ritonavir / Lopinavir / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Antivir Ther Journal subject: Drug Therapy / Virology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: IMP3385

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ritonavir / Lopinavir / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Antivir Ther Journal subject: Drug Therapy / Virology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: IMP3385