Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Temporal Bibliometry Networks of SARS, MERS and COVID19 Reveal Dynamics of the Pandemic
Stud. Comput. Intell. ; 944:700-711, 2021.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-1130718
ABSTRACT
A world crisis brings forth new, often unexpected responses that are fascinating to investigate from both scientific and social standpoints. A comprehensive bibliometric investigation of such an event can offer insights into politics of the pandemic, not just providing incentives for improving scientific quality and productivity, but also dissecting the role of global competition and marginalization in terms of funding and peerage. The sheer numbers of publications witnessed in less than 10 months of the novel coronavirus outbreak, indicates how scientists from all walks of life, irrespective of their respective fields of interests, shifted to COVID19 research, leading to discoveries and new directions of research for many. However, this shift has also resulted in shocking factoids based on incomplete interpretations of scientific data, which have continued to be foisted on the public at an alarming rate during the past nine months of COVID, the most colossal of these being the Lancet HCQ story. In this work, we use the 2020 COVID-19 publications to identify bibliometric communities that we compare temporally across two major epidemics of SARS and MERS. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: Scopus Language: English Journal: Stud. Comput. Intell. Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: Scopus Language: English Journal: Stud. Comput. Intell. Year: 2021 Document Type: Article