Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Effects of cancer screening restart strategies after COVID-19 disruption.
Kregting, Lindy M; Kaljouw, Sylvia; de Jonge, Lucie; Jansen, Erik E L; Peterse, Elisabeth F P; Heijnsdijk, Eveline A M; van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T; Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris; de Kok, Inge M C M.
  • Kregting LM; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. l.kregting@erasmusmc.nl.
  • Kaljouw S; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • de Jonge L; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Jansen EEL; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Peterse EFP; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Heijnsdijk EAM; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Ravesteyn NT; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • de Kok IMCM; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Br J Cancer ; 124(9): 1516-1523, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1135654
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Many breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening programmes were disrupted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to estimate the effects of five restart strategies after the disruption on required screening capacity and cancer burden.

METHODS:

Microsimulation models simulated five restart strategies for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. The models estimated required screening capacity, cancer incidence, and cancer-specific mortality after a disruption of 6 months. The restart strategies varied in whether screens were caught up or not and, if so, immediately or delayed, and whether the upper age limit was increased.

RESULTS:

The disruption in screening programmes without catch-up of missed screens led to an increase of 2.0, 0.3, and 2.5 cancer deaths per 100 000 individuals in 10 years in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Immediately catching-up missed screens minimised the impact of the disruption but required a surge in screening capacity. Delaying screening, but still offering all screening rounds gave the best balance between required capacity, incidence, and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS:

Strategies with the smallest loss in health effects were also the most burdensome for the screening organisations. Which strategy is preferred depends on the organisation and available capacity in a country.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Colorectal Neoplasms / Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Early Detection of Cancer / Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Br J Cancer Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41416-021-01261-9

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Colorectal Neoplasms / Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Early Detection of Cancer / Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Br J Cancer Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41416-021-01261-9