Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Accurate point-of-care serology tests for COVID-19.
Schuler, Charles F; Gherasim, Carmen; O'Shea, Kelly; Manthei, David M; Chen, Jesse; Giacherio, Don; Troost, Jonathan P; Baldwin, James L; Baker, James R.
  • Schuler CF; Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
  • Gherasim C; Mary H. Weiser Food Allergy Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
  • O'Shea K; Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
  • Manthei DM; Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
  • Chen J; Mary H. Weiser Food Allergy Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
  • Giacherio D; Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
  • Troost JP; Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
  • Baldwin JL; Michigan Nanotechnology Institute for Medicine and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
  • Baker JR; Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 16(3): e0248729, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1136300
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

As COVID-19 vaccines become available, screening individuals for prior COVID-19 infection and vaccine response in point-of-care (POC) settings has renewed interest. We prospectively screened at-risk individuals for SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid protein antibodies in a POC setting to determine if it was a feasible method to identify antibody from prior infection.

METHODS:

Three EUA-approved lateral flow antibody assays were performed on POC finger-stick blood and compared with serum and a CLIA nucleocapsid antibody immunoassay. Variables including antibody class, time since PCR, and the assay antigen used were evaluated.

RESULTS:

512 subjects enrolled, of which 104 had a COVID-19 history and positive PCR. Only three PCR-positive subjects required hospitalization, with one requiring mechanical ventilation. The POC results correlated well with the immunoassay (93-97% sensitivity) and using serum did not improve the sensitivity or specificity.

CONCLUSIONS:

Finger-stick, POC COVID-19 antibody testing was highly effective in identifying antibody resulting from prior infections in mildly symptomatic subjects. Using high-complexity serum immunoassays did not improve the screening outcome. Almost all individuals with COVID-19 infection produced detectable antibodies to the virus. POC antibody testing is useful as a screen for prior COVID-19 infection, and should be useful in assessing vaccine response.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Point-of-Care Systems / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0248729

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Point-of-Care Systems / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0248729