Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Predicting pulmonary embolism in patients infected with COVID-19 based on D-dimer levels and days between diagnosis of the infection and D-dimer determination.
Garcia-Olivé, Ignasi; Sintes, Helena; Radua, Joaquim; Deportos, Jordi; Nogueira, Isabel; Morales-Indiano, Cristian; Abad Capa, Jorge; Rosell, Antoni.
  • Garcia-Olivé I; Department of Respiratory Medicine. ignasi.g.olive@gmail.com.
  • Sintes H; Department of Respiratory Medicine. hsintes.germanstrias@gencat.cat.
  • Radua J; Imaging of Mood- and Anxiety-Related Disorders (IMARD) group. quimradua@gmail.com.
  • Deportos J; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona. jordi.deportos.idi@gencat.cat.
  • Nogueira I; Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona. inogueira.germanstrias@gencat.cat.
  • Morales-Indiano C; Department of Clinical Analysis and Biochemistry, Laboratori Clínic Metropolitana Nord, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias Correspondence: Ignasi Garcia Olivé, Department of Respiratory i Pujol, Badalona. cmorales.germanstrias@gencat.cat.
  • Abad Capa J; Department of Respiratory Medicine. jabadc.germanstrias@gencat.cat.
  • Rosell A; Department of Respiratory Medicine. arosellg.germanstrias@gencat.cat.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis ; 91(2)2021 Mar 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1138811
ABSTRACT
Ruling out pulmonary embolism (PE) can be challenging in a situation of elevated D-dimer values such as in a case of COVID-19 infection. Our objective was to evaluate the difference in D-dimer values of subjects infected with COVID-19 in those with PE and those without and to analyze the predictive value of D-dimer for PE in these subjects based on the day of D-dimer determination. This was an observational, retrospective study, conducted at a tertiary hospital. All subjects with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection requiring hospital admission at our institution between the months of March and April 2020 were included in the study. We compared D-dimer levels in subjects who went on to develop a PE and those who did not. We then created a model to predict the subsequent development of a PE with the current D-dimer levels of the subject. D-dimer levels changed over time from COVID-19 diagnosis, but were always higher in subjects who went on to develop a PE. Regarding the predictive model created, the area under the curve of the ROC analyses of the cross-validation predictions was 0.72. The risk of pulmonary embolism for the same D-dimer levels varied depending on the number of days elapsed since COVID-19 diagnosis and D-dimer determination. To conclude, D-dimer levels were elevated in subjects with a COVID-19 infection, especially in those with PE. D-dimer levels increased during the first 10 days after the diagnosis of the infection and can be used to predict the risk of PE in COVID-19 subjects.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pulmonary Embolism / Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products / Models, Statistical / Clinical Decision Rules / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Long Covid Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pulmonary Embolism / Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products / Models, Statistical / Clinical Decision Rules / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Long Covid Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article