Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Risk of COVID-19 transmission in esophageal, anorectal manometry and 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring.
Pérez de la Serna Y Bueno, Julio; Ruiz de León San Juan, Antonio; Sevilla Mantilla, Concepción; Ciriza de Los Ríos, Constanza; Atarain Valles, Ana; Aparicio Cabezudo, Marta; García Pravia, Laura; Olivares Quintanar, David; Rey Díaz-Rubio, Enrique.
  • Pérez de la Serna Y Bueno J; Motility Unit. Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, ESPAÑA.
  • Ruiz de León San Juan A; Motility Unit. Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, ESPAÑA.
  • Sevilla Mantilla C; Motility Unit. Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, ESPAÑA.
  • Ciriza de Los Ríos C; Motility Unit. Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, ESPAÑA.
  • Atarain Valles A; Motility Unit. Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, ESPAÑA.
  • Aparicio Cabezudo M; Motility Unit. Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, ESPAÑA.
  • García Pravia L; Motility Unit. Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, ESPAÑA.
  • Olivares Quintanar D; Motility Unit. Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, ESPAÑA.
  • Rey Díaz-Rubio E; Motility Unit. Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, ESPAÑA.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 113(5): 332-338, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1140837
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to the interruption of most manometry or impedance-pH monitoring studies. The risk of restarting activities is unknown.

OBJECTIVE:

assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 virus infection, both to patients and healthcare workers, in relation to esophageal and anorectal functional tests during the pandemic without protective measures.

METHOD:

a questionnaire was designed to determine whether patients and healthcare workers had COVID-19, confirmed by either a test or compatible symptoms, after functional studies were performed from January until March 2020.

RESULTS:

the survey was answered by 263 (92.9 %) patients. Four (1.52 %) patients had confirmed COVID-19 in the two weeks after the functional test (adjusted rate 8.34 cases per 1,000 [95 % CI -0.06-16.74], OR 0.84 [95 % CI 0.83-0.85], p < 0.001) and no patient after anorectal manometry. Another five had only compatible symptoms, for a total of nine patients (3.42 %) (adjusted rate 27.50 cases/1,000 [95 % CI 7.27-47.74], OR 2.84 [95 % CI 2.81-2.87]). In the total study period, 18.25 % had confirmed COVID-19 or compatible symptoms. The average number of days between the procedure and the first day of symptoms was progressively shortened (January 56 days, February 33 days, March 10.5 days). Two of ten healthcare workers (20 %) had confirmed COVID-19.

CONCLUSIONS:

the risk of COVID-19 infection when performing functional tests is low and more related to the evolution of the pandemic rather than to the procedure itself. The small number of healthcare workers included in the study does not allow a definitive conclusion to be drawn on their risk of infection.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Rev Esp Enferm Dig Journal subject: Gastroenterology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Rev Esp Enferm Dig Journal subject: Gastroenterology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article