Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Real-time virtual infection prevention and control assessments in skilled nursing homes, New York, March 2020-A pilot project.
Ostrowsky, Belinda E; Weil, Lauren M; Olaisen, R Henry; Stricof, Rachel L; Adams, Eleanor H; Tsivitis, Marie I; Eramo, Antonella; Giardina, Rosalie; Erazo, Richard; Southwick, Karen L; Greenko, Jane A; Lutterloh, Emily C; Blog, Debra S; Green, Crystal; Carrasco, Kimberly; Fernandez, Rafael; Vallabhaneni, Snigdha; Quinn, Monica; Kogut, Sarah J; Bennett, Joy; Chico, David M; Luzinas, Martha.
  • Ostrowsky BE; Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Weil LM; Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Olaisen RH; Epidemic Intelligence Service, Division of Scientific Education and Professional Development, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Stricof RL; New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York.
  • Adams EH; New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH Metropolitan Regional Office), New Rochelle, New York.
  • Tsivitis MI; New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH Metropolitan Regional Office), New Rochelle, New York.
  • Eramo A; New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH Metropolitan Regional Office), New Rochelle, New York.
  • Giardina R; New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH Metropolitan Regional Office), New Rochelle, New York.
  • Erazo R; New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH Metropolitan Regional Office), New Rochelle, New York.
  • Southwick KL; New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH Metropolitan Regional Office), New Rochelle, New York.
  • Greenko JA; New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH Metropolitan Regional Office), New Rochelle, New York.
  • Lutterloh EC; New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York.
  • Blog DS; University at Albany, SUNY, School of Public Health, Albany, New York.
  • Green C; University at Albany, SUNY, School of Public Health, Albany, New York.
  • Fernandez R; New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH Metropolitan Regional Office), New Rochelle, New York.
  • Vallabhaneni S; New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH Metropolitan Regional Office), New Rochelle, New York.
  • Quinn M; New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH Metropolitan Regional Office), New Rochelle, New York.
  • Kogut SJ; Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Bennett J; New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York.
  • Chico DM; New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York.
  • Luzinas M; New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets, Albany, New York.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(3): 351-357, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1142375
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To describe a pilot project infection prevention and control (IPC) assessment conducted in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) in New York State (NYS) during a pivotal 2-week period when the region became the nation's epicenter for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

DESIGN:

A telephone and video assessment of IPC measures in SNFs at high risk or experiencing COVID-19 activity.

PARTICIPANTS:

SNFs in 14 New York counties, including New York City. INTERVENTION A 3-component remote IPC assessment (1) screening tool; (2) telephone IPC checklist; and (3) COVID-19 video IPC assessment (ie, "COVIDeo").

RESULTS:

In total, 92 SNFs completed the IPC screening tool and checklist 52 (57%) were conducted as part COVID-19 investigations, and 40 (43%) were proactive prevention-based assessments. Among the 40 proactive assessments, 14 (35%) identified suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases. COVIDeo was performed in 26 (28%) of 92 assessments and provided observations that other tools would have missed personal protective equipment (PPE) that was not easily accessible, redundant, or improperly donned, doffed, or stored and specific challenges implementing IPC in specialty populations. The IPC assessments took ∼1 hour each and reached an estimated 4 times as many SNFs as on-site visits in a similar time frame.

CONCLUSIONS:

Remote IPC assessments by telephone and video were timely and feasible methods of assessing the extent to which IPC interventions had been implemented in a vulnerable setting and to disseminate real-time recommendations. Remote assessments are now being implemented across New York State and in various healthcare facility types. Similar methods have been adapted nationally by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Journal subject: Communicable Diseases / Nursing / Epidemiology / Hospitals Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ice.2021.100

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Journal subject: Communicable Diseases / Nursing / Epidemiology / Hospitals Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ice.2021.100