Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Rapid point-of-care testing for COVID-19: quality of supportive information for lateral flow serology assays.
Kierkegaard, Patrick; McLister, Anna; Buckle, Peter.
  • Kierkegaard P; NIHR London In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK p.kierkegaard@imperial.ac.uk.
  • McLister A; CRUK Convergence Science Centre, Institute of Cancer Research & Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Buckle P; NIHR London In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
BMJ Open ; 11(3): e047163, 2021 03 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1143051
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

There is a lack of evidence addressing several important human factors questions pertaining to the quality of supportive information provided by commercial manufacturers that can affect the adoption and use of lateral flow serology assays in practice. We aimed to (1) identify and assess the quality of information that commercial manufacturers provided for their point-of-care tests (POCTs) and (2) examine the implications of these findings on real-world settings.

DESIGN:

We used a content analysis methodology in two stages to systematically, code and analyse textual data from documents of commercial manufacturers. A deductive approach was applied using a coding guide based on the validated Point-of-Care Key Evidence Tool (POCKET) multidimensional checklist. An inductive approach was used to identify new patterns or themes generated from our textual analysis.

SETTING:

Publicly available supportive information documents by commercial manufacturers for lateral flow serology, were identified and gathered from online searches.

PARTICIPANTS:

Supportive information documents retrieved from online searches over 3 months (March 2020 to June 2020).

RESULTS:

A total of 79 POCTs were identified that met the study inclusion criteria. Using the POCKET coding guide, we found that the quality of information varied significantly between the manufacturers and was often lacking in detail. Our inductive approach further examined these topics and found that several statements were vague and that significant variations in the level of details existed between manufacturers.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study revealed significant concerns surrounding the supportive information reported by manufacturers for lateral flow serology assays. Information transparency was poor and human factor issues were not properly addressed to mitigate the risk of improper device use, although it should be noted that the results of our study are limited by the data that manufactures were prepared to disclose. Overall, commercial manufacturers should improve the quality and value of information presented in their supporting documentation.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Point-of-Care Testing / COVID-19 Serological Testing / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2020-047163

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Point-of-Care Testing / COVID-19 Serological Testing / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2020-047163