Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Usefulness of a multiplex immunodot in case of discordant results between automated COVID-19 serological assays.
Soleimani, Reza; Khourssaji, Mehdi; Aupaix, Antoine; Rodriguez-Villalobos, Hector; Scohy, Anaïs; Kabamba-Mukadi, Benoît.
  • Soleimani R; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc and Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Khourssaji M; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc and Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Aupaix A; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc and Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Rodriguez-Villalobos H; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc and Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Scohy A; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc and Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Kabamba-Mukadi B; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc and Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Scientific Research Pole of Medical Microbiology, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
J Virol Methods ; 292: 114129, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1144852
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

At present, the only reliable test for COVID-19 diagnosis is RT-qPCR. Serological assays have been widely used to increase the detection sensitivity of infected population. Hereby, we report the performance of a new pan-IgG multiplex Enzyme Immunoassay (immunodot) method for exploration of discrepant SARS-COV-2 serological results.

METHODS:

A retrospective study on 38 residual serum samples from recovered COVID-19 subjects with discordant serological results on Roche and Snibe platforms, were reanalyzed on a new semi-automated pan-IgG immunodot Enzyme Immunoassay, namely COVIDOT-TEST, in order to find the source of discrepancies and to evaluate the latter method. All samples were analyzed on the BlueDiver® Instrument and all strips were read by the BlueScan® Scanner using Dr DOT® Software.

RESULTS:

Based on our data, subject samples showed specific IgG reactions on ≥ 2 different antigens on immunodot strips. Of these 38 samples, 97.4 % of samples showed specific IgG reaction against S1 + S2 antigens, 89.5 % showed against RBD antigen, 86.8 % against S2 antigen reaction on the COVIDOT-TEST kit. Specific IgG-S1 antigen and IgG-N antigen reactions were detected in 73.7 % and 65.8 % of the samples, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

The new semi-automated pan-IgG immunodot Enzyme Immunoassay method appeared to be a reliable assay to confirm suspicious COVID-19 serological screening results.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Immunoenzyme Techniques / COVID-19 Serological Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: J Virol Methods Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.jviromet.2021.114129

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Immunoenzyme Techniques / COVID-19 Serological Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: J Virol Methods Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.jviromet.2021.114129