Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Effects of Enhanced Personal Protective Equipment.
Düzenli, Tolga; Köseoglu, Hüseyin.
  • Düzenli T; Department of Gastroenterology, Hitit University Erol Olcok Training and Research Hospital, Corum, Turkey. tolgaduzenli@yahoo.com.
  • Köseoglu H; Department of Gastroenterology, Hitit University Erol Olcok Training and Research Hospital, Corum, Turkey.
Dig Dis Sci ; 66(6): 1845-1851, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1146518
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

Personal protective equipment (PPE) decreases the risk of disease contagion, and because of the COVID-19 pandemic, enhanced PPE (EPPE) is widely used during endoscopic procedures including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of EPPE on ERCP success parameters compared to standard PPE (SPPE).

METHODS:

ERCP procedures were evaluated retrospectively and ERCP outcomes were compared for similar time periods as before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Primary outcomes were cannulation time, number of cannulation attempts, cannulation success rate, difficult cannulation rate, undesired pancreatic duct cannulation rate, ERCP-related adverse events, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS:

Three hundred and eighty ERCP procedures were examined. One hundred and fifty-nine procedures were excluded due to missing data, previous sphincterotomy or altered anatomy. Of the final eligible sample size of 221 ERCPs, 93 were performed using SPPE and 128 were performed under EPPE. Indications of ERCP and demographic parameters were similar between groups. The majority of the ERCP cases included were for benign biliary obstruction of common bile duct stones (88.7%). No significant differences were detected in overall technical success (91.4% vs 92.2%, p = 0.832), cannulation success rates (94.6% vs 96.8%, p = 0.403), cannulation times (median times of both groups were 3 min, p = 0.824), difficult cannulation rates (37.6% vs 33.6%, p = 0.523), undesired pancreatic duct cannulation rates (29% vs 22.7%, p = 0.593), number of cannulation attempts (2.80 vs 2.71, p = 0.731), ERCP-related adverse events (9.7% vs 10.9%, p = 0.762), and length of hospital stay (6.63 vs 6.92 days, p = 0.768) between SPPE and EPPE groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Biliary obstructions of common bile duct stones were the major indication of ERCP in the current study. The use of EPPE had no negative effects on ERCP performance in this patient group. ERCP can be effectively performed under EPPE.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Occupational Exposure / Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde / Infection Control / Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Dig Dis Sci Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S10620-021-06940-4

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Occupational Exposure / Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde / Infection Control / Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Dig Dis Sci Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S10620-021-06940-4