Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Gathering, processing, and interpreting information about COVID-19.
Boot, Arnout B; Eerland, Anita; Jongerling, Joran; Verkoeijen, Peter P J L; Zwaan, Rolf A.
  • Boot AB; Department of Psychology, Education, and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Mandeville Building, Room T13-44, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. boot@essb.eur.nl.
  • Eerland A; Department of Languages, Literature, and Communication, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Jongerling J; Department of Psychology, Education, and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Mandeville Building, Room T13-44, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Verkoeijen PPJL; Department of Psychology, Education, and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Mandeville Building, Room T13-44, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Zwaan RA; Brain and Learning Research Group, Learning and Innovation Center, Avans University of Applied Sciences, Breda, The Netherlands.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 6569, 2021 03 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1146605
ABSTRACT
Does cognitive motivation influence how people gather and interpret information about COVID-19 and their adherence to measures? To address these questions, we conducted a longitudinal survey among European and American respondents. Wave 1 (N = 501) was conducted on March 27, 2020 and Wave 2 (N = 326) on July 1, 2020. We assessed COVID-19 knowledge, endorsement of COVID-19 conspiracy theories, media use, Need for Cognition (NC), Need for Cognitive Closure (NCC), and self-reported adherence to governmental measures taken. Results showed that nearly three-quarters of our respondents actively searched for information about COVID-19. Most at least once a day. Information seeking behaviour was not influenced by cognitive motivation (i.e., NC and NCC). However, cognitive motivation was related to (1) knowledge about COVID-19, (2) conspiracy rejection, and (3) change in knowledge over time. Respondents with more knowledge on COVID-19 also indicated to adhere more often to measures taken by their government. Self-reported adherence to measures was not influenced by cognitive motivation. Implications of these findings will be discussed.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Knowledge / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Variants Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-021-86088-3

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Knowledge / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Variants Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-021-86088-3