Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Risk of Airborne COVID-19 Transmission While Performing Humphrey Visual Field Testing.
Jain, Nikhil; Kaur, Simerdip; Kopsachilis, Nikolaos; Zia, Rashid.
  • Jain N; University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London.
  • Kaur S; East Kent Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Kent and Canterbury Hospital Ethelbert Road, Canterbury.
  • Kopsachilis N; East Kent Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Kent and Canterbury Hospital Ethelbert Road, Canterbury.
  • Zia R; New Hayesbank Ophthalmology Services, Cemetery Lane, Kennington, Kent, UK.
J Glaucoma ; 30(3): 219-222, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1147202
ABSTRACT
PRECIS Designing and demonstrating an experiment that shows the risk of airborne transmission of COVID-19 between patients having visual fields analyzed is low.

PURPOSE:

The aim was to investigate the possibility of airborne transmission of COVID-19 during Humphrey visual field testing in a real-world scenario.

METHODS:

A particle counter was placed within the bowl of Humphrey visual field analyzer (HFA) before and after turning on the machine to ascertain the effect of the air current produced by the ventilation system on aerosols. A second experiment was run where the particle counter was placed in the bowl and recorded particulates, in the air, as a 24-2 SITA standard was performed by a mock patient and then again immediately after the patient had moved away. We measured aerosol particle counts sized ≤0.3 µm, >0.3≤0.5 µm, >0.5≤1 µm, >1≤2.5 µm, >2.5≤5 µm, and >5≤10 µm.

RESULTS:

Particulates of all sizes were shown to be significantly reduced within the bowl after turning the machine on, demonstrating that the air current produced by the HFA pushes air out of the bowl and it cannot stagnate. There was no significant difference in measurement of aerosol while there was a patient performing the test and immediately after they had moved away, suggesting that aerosols breathed out by the patient are not able to remain in suspension in the bowl because of the ventilation current.

CONCLUSION:

There is no significant difference between aerosol count in the bowl of a HFA before, during and after testing. This suggests the risk of airborne transmission of COVID-19 is low between subsequent patients. This is in keeping with manufacturer's guidance on Humphrey visual field testing.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Visual Fields / Ocular Hypertension / Disease Transmission, Infectious / Aerosols / Visual Field Tests / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Glaucoma Journal subject: Ophthalmology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Visual Fields / Ocular Hypertension / Disease Transmission, Infectious / Aerosols / Visual Field Tests / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Glaucoma Journal subject: Ophthalmology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article