Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Evaluation of Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay automated test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP) in nasopharyngeal swabs for community and population screening.
Gili, Alessio; Paggi, Riccardo; Russo, Carla; Cenci, Elio; Pietrella, Donatella; Graziani, Alessandro; Stracci, Fabrizio; Mencacci, Antonella.
  • Gili A; Public Health Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
  • Paggi R; Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
  • Russo C; Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
  • Cenci E; Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
  • Pietrella D; Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
  • Graziani A; Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
  • Stracci F; Public Health Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
  • Mencacci A; Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. Electronic address: antonella.mencacci@unipg.it.
Int J Infect Dis ; 105: 391-396, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1147708
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To compare the Lumipulse® SARS-CoV-2 antigen test with the gold standard real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and to evaluate its role in screening programs.

METHODS:

Lumipulse® SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay was compared with the gold standard RT-PCR test in a selected cohort of 226 subjects with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, and its accuracy was evaluated. Subsequently, the test was administered to a real-life screening cohort of 1738 cases. ROC analysis was performed to explore test features and cutoffs. All tests were performed in the regional reference laboratory in Umbria, Italy.

RESULTS:

A 42.0% positive result at RT-PCR was observed in the selected cohort. The Lumipulse® system showed 92.6% sensitivity (95% CI 85.4-97.0%) and 90.8% specificity (95% CI 84.5-95.2%) at 1.24 pg/mL optimal cutoff. In the screening cohort, characterized by 5.2% prevalence of infection, Lumipulse® assay showed 100% sensitivity (95% CI 96.0-100.0%) and 94.8% specificity (95% CI 93.6-95.8%) at 1.645 pg/mL optimal cutoff; the AUC was 97.4%, NPV was 100% (95% CI 99.8-100.0%) and PPV was 51.1% (95% CI 43.5-58.7%).

CONCLUSIONS:

The Lumipulse® SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay can be safely employed in the screening strategies in small and large communities and in the general population.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mass Screening / Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins / COVID-19 Serological Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Antigens, Viral Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Int J Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.ijid.2021.02.098

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mass Screening / Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins / COVID-19 Serological Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Antigens, Viral Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Int J Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.ijid.2021.02.098