Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Personalized collection of plasma from healthy donors: A randomized controlled trial of a novel technology-enabled nomogram.
Hartmann, Jan; Ragusa, Michael J; Burchardt, Elmar R; Manukyan, Zorayr; Popovsky, Mark A; Leitman, Susan F.
  • Hartmann J; Haemonetics Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Ragusa MJ; Haemonetics Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Burchardt ER; University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
  • Manukyan Z; ClinStatDevice, Lexington, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Popovsky MA; Haemonetics Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Leitman SF; National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Transfusion ; 61(6): 1789-1798, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1148091
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Source plasma is essential to support the growing demand for plasma-derived medicinal products. Supply is short, with donor availability further limited by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study examined whether a novel, personalized, technology-based nomogram was noninferior with regard to significant hypotensive adverse events (AEs) in healthy donors. STUDY DESIGN AND

METHODS:

IMPACT (IMproving PlasmA CollecTion) was a prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial carried out between January 6 and March 26, 2020, in three U.S plasma collection centers. Donors were randomly assigned to the current simplified 1992 nomogram (control) or a novel percent plasma nomogram (PPN) with personalized target volume calculation (experimental). Primary endpoint was the rate of significant hypotensive AEs. Noninferiority (NI) was tested with a margin of 0.15%. Collected plasma volume was a secondary endpoint.

RESULTS:

A total of 3443 donors (mean [SD] BMI 32 [7.74] kg/m2 ; 65% male) underwent 23,137 donations (median [range] 6 [1-22] per subject). Ten significant hypotensive AEs were observed (six control; four experimental), with model-based AE incidence rate estimates (95% CI) of 0.051% (0.020%-0.114%) and 0.035% (0.010%-0.094%), respectively (p = .58). NI was met at an upper limit of 0.043% versus the predefined margin of 0.15%. There was no statistical difference between total AEs (all AE types p = .32). Mean plasma volume collected was 777.8 ml (control) versus 841.7 ml (experimental); an increase of 63.9 ml per donation (8.2%; p < .0001).

CONCLUSION:

This trial showed that a novel personalized nomogram approach in healthy donors allowed approximately 8% more plasma per donation to be collected without impairing donor safety.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Specimen Collection / Nomograms / Precision Medicine / Blood Safety / Healthy Volunteers Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Transfusion Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Trf.16389

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Specimen Collection / Nomograms / Precision Medicine / Blood Safety / Healthy Volunteers Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Transfusion Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Trf.16389