Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Optimism Bias, Pessimism Bias, Magical Beliefs, and Conspiracy Theory Beliefs Related to COVID-19 among the Jordanian Population.
Hammad, Alaa M; Hamed, Rania; Al-Qerem, Walid; Bandar, Ameena; Hall, Frank Scott.
  • Hammad AM; 1Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
  • Hamed R; 1Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
  • Al-Qerem W; 1Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
  • Bandar A; 2Department of Pharmacy, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
  • Hall FS; 3Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 104(5): 1661-1671, 2021 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1150851
ABSTRACT
The outbreak of the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus has an enormous impact on health. People's views about the virus impact public health efforts to mitigate the pandemic. In this study, we measured misconceptions toward coronavirus in the Jordanian population; 2,544 participants from the Jordanian population completed an online survey. Questions in the survey addressed misconceptions divided into four categories optimism bias, pessimism bias, magical beliefs, and conspiracy theory beliefs. Questions were evaluated on a Likert scale, and average/median scores for each category were evaluated ("one" high misconception to "five" low misconception). Overall, the most common misconceptions involved conspiracy theory beliefs (2.68 ± 0.83), whereas the least common involved magical beliefs (2.25 ± 0.75). Females had more misconceptions than males (2.52 versus 2.47, P = 0.04). Participants who had attended a lecture on coronavirus, had a higher level of education, worked in a medical field, lived in urban area, or resided in Amman or northern Jordan had fewer misconceptions about SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 (2.64, 2.34, 2.33, 2.50 and 2.50 versus 2.53, 2.73, 2.72, 2.64, and 2.66, respectively, P < 0.001). The use of social media appeared to be an important factor influencing the likelihood of false beliefs (2.61 versus 2.38, P < 0.001). Understanding of the factors influencing public perceptions surrounding the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic will help public health authorities improve public understanding and compliance with public health recommendations directed at combatting the virus, including the use of surgical masks, thorough handwashing, and avoiding close contact. These messages will be better received by the public through correcting misconceptions surrounding COVID-19.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Culture / Optimism / Pessimism / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ajtmh.20-1412

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Culture / Optimism / Pessimism / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ajtmh.20-1412