Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Communication with fertility patients during the COVID-19 pandemic- let's talk about it.
Karavani, Gilad; Chill, Henry H; Meirman, Cherut; Dior, Uri P; Ben-Meir, Assaf.
  • Karavani G; Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Israel; Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Hadassah Medical Center.
  • Chill HH; Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Israel; Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Hadassah Medical Center. Electronic address: henchill@gmail.com.
  • Meirman C; Department of Family Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
  • Dior UP; Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Israel; Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Hadassah Medical Center; Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel; Infertility and IVF Unit, Hadassah Medical Center.
  • Ben-Meir A; Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Israel; Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Hadassah Medical Center; Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel; Infertility and IVF Unit, Hadassah Medical Center.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 260: 154-158, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1152337
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the activity of a tertiary fertility service and compare telemedicine and face-to-face meetings during this time.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a university affiliated tertiary medical center. Included were patients scheduled for an appointment in the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) unit between March 18th and April 15th. A comparison was made between patients who chose telemedicine as opposed to face-to-face meetings. Additionally, the population of patients who chose to cancel their appointment was characterized. IVF cycle outcomes were additionally compared between the groups.

RESULTS:

Overall, 90 IVF clinic appointments were scheduled during the study period. Thirty-four (37.8 %) patients chose to arrive to the clinic in spite of the COVID 19 pandemic and partial quarantine, 27 (30.0 %) patients chose to avoid in person meeting and scheduled a telemedicine appointment and 29 (32.2 %) patients cancelled their appointment. On comparison between patients who chose telemedicine vs. face-to-face meeting, the telemedicine group had lower prevalence of primary infertility (20.0 % vs. 47.1 %, p = 0.037) and higher rates of preimplantation genetic testing indication for in-vitro fertilization (48.2 % vs. 20.6 %, p = 0.026). Rate of a first-ever clinic visit was higher in patients that arrived for a face-to-face meeting, as compared to telemedicine encounter (55.9 % vs. 28.0 %, respectively; p = 0.036). Patients that opted to avoid attending the clinic or meeting via telemedicine had higher rates of medical comorbidities compared to patients who chose to attend their appointment (51.7 % vs. 29.5 %, p = 0.016). Rate of appointments that led to fresh or frozen-thawed embryo transfer and these transfers' outcomes (clinical pregnancy rate) were similar in the telemedicine and face-to-face meeting groups (72.2 % vs. 88.0 % and 30.8 % vs. 31.8 %, p = 0.73 and p = 1.00; respectively).

CONCLUSION:

Telemedicine is a valuable tool for delivering fertility care during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is need to determine which patients will benefit most from this modality.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: English Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: English Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article