Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Journalistic Denial of Death during the Very First Traumatic Period of the Italian COVID-19 Pandemic.
Solomon, Sheldon; Rostellato, Daniele; Testoni, Ines; Calabrese, Fiorella; Biasco, Guido.
  • Solomon S; Psychology Department, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA.
  • Rostellato D; Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.
  • Testoni I; Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.
  • Calabrese F; Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Science (DCTV), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
  • Biasco G; Department of Specialistic, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Behav Sci (Basel) ; 11(3)2021 Mar 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1154286
ABSTRACT
Exactly one year ago, between February and March 2020, the COVID-19 infection went from an epidemic confined to China to a worldwide pandemic that was particularly lethal in Italy. This study examined the media accounts during that period by analysing the representation of death-related constructs in Corriere della Sera, the most widely read newspaper in Italy. A textual and thematic analysis of articles published between period A (epidemic 23 January-22 February 2020) and period B (pandemic 23 February-31 March 2020) was conducted using Nvivo-11. A total of 141 articles comprising 48,524 words were collected. The most utilised words and meanings linked to COVID-19 were computed. In the rank distribution, 'China' and 'virus' were the terms most frequently used in both periods. The terms 'death' and 'dead' were completely absent in period A and appeared in the 535th position in period B. The term 'dead' was used primarily to indicate the number of deceased. From a Terror Management Theory perspective, it is possible that the minimal reference to death-related issues was a reflection of death denial and a manifestation of efforts to deny death to manage terror. These findings highlight the ambiguities and ambivalence surrounding any issue pertaining to death; on the one side, undue alarmism may provoke exaggerated reactions, such as moral panic, while on the other denial-based messages that minimise references to mortality may reduce safe behaviour during a pandemic.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bs11030041

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bs11030041