Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Contact Isolation Is Not Better than Standard Precautions for Decreasing Acquisition of ESBL-Producing Enterobacterales
Infectious Disease Alert ; 39(10), 2020.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1156367
ABSTRACT
Antibiotic consumption at the ward level did not differ between intervention protocols. [...]there was no difference in acquisition of ESBL-producing E. coli (which made up 73% of cases) and K. pneumonia between contact isolation and standard precautions. [...]the delay in laboratory turnaround time in reporting ESBL-E positive samples (median four days, range three to five days) led to delays in implementing contact isolation. [...]evidence suggests that patient-to-patient transmission is not the main pathway for the spread of ESBL-E.
Search on Google
Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: ProQuest Central Language: English Journal: Infectious Disease Alert Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: ProQuest Central Language: English Journal: Infectious Disease Alert Year: 2020 Document Type: Article