Contact Isolation Is Not Better than Standard Precautions for Decreasing Acquisition of ESBL-Producing Enterobacterales
Infectious Disease Alert
; 39(10), 2020.
Article
in English
| ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1156367
ABSTRACT
Antibiotic consumption at the ward level did not differ between intervention protocols. [...]there was no difference in acquisition of ESBL-producing E. coli (which made up 73% of cases) and K. pneumonia between contact isolation and standard precautions. [...]the delay in laboratory turnaround time in reporting ESBL-E positive samples (median four days, range three to five days) led to delays in implementing contact isolation. [...]evidence suggests that patient-to-patient transmission is not the main pathway for the spread of ESBL-E.
Search on Google
Collection:
Databases of international organizations
Database:
ProQuest Central
Language:
English
Journal:
Infectious Disease Alert
Year:
2020
Document Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS