Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 total antibody detection via a lateral flow nanoparticle fluorescence immunoassay.
Sibai, Mamdouh; Solis, Daniel; Röltgen, Katharina; Stevens, Bryan A; Mfuh, Kenji O; Sahoo, Malaya K; Shi, Run Z; Zehnder, James; Boyd, Scott D; Pinsky, Benjamin A.
  • Sibai M; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Solis D; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Röltgen K; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Stevens BA; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Clinical Virology Laboratory, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Mfuh KO; Clinical Virology Laboratory, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Sahoo MK; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Shi RZ; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Zehnder J; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Boyd SD; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Pinsky BA; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Clinical Virology Laboratory, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. Elect
J Clin Virol ; 139: 104818, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1164017
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) endgame may benefit from simple, accurate antibody testing to characterize seroprevalence and immunization coverage.

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the performance of the lateral flow QIAreach anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total rapid nanoparticle fluorescence immunoassay compared to reference isotype-specific IgG, IgM, and IgA SARS-CoV-2 ELISA using S1 or receptor binding domain (RBD) as antigens. STUDY

DESIGN:

A diagnostic comparison study was carried out using 154 well-characterized heparin plasma samples. Agreement between assays was assessed by overall, positive, and negative percent agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient.

RESULTS:

Overall agreement between the QIAreach anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total and any anti-spike domain (S1 or RBD) antibody isotype was 96.0 % (95 % CI 89.8-98.8), the positive percent agreement was 97.6 % (95 % CI 91.0-99.9), the negative percent agreement was 88.2 % (95 % CI 64.4-98.0). The kappa coefficient was 0.86 (95 % CI 0.72 to 0.99).

CONCLUSION:

The QIAreach anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total rapid antibody test provides comparable performance to high-complexity, laboratory-based ELISA.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Fluorescent Antibody Technique / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Antibodies, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: J Clin Virol Journal subject: Virology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.jcv.2021.104818

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Fluorescent Antibody Technique / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Antibodies, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: J Clin Virol Journal subject: Virology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.jcv.2021.104818