Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mental Health and Quality & Safety of Care in Czech Residential Institutions during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Guerrero, Zoe; Aliev, Akmal-Alikhan; Kondrátová, Lucie; Jozefiaková, Bibiána; Nesázalová, Natálie; Sanáková, Josephine Gabriela; Winkler, Petr.
  • Guerrero Z; Department of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic.
  • Aliev AA; Department of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic. Akmal.aliev@hotmail.com.
  • Kondrátová L; Department of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic.
  • Jozefiaková B; Department of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic.
  • Nesázalová N; Social Health Institute, Palacky University, Univerzitní 22, 771 11, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
  • Sanáková JG; Department of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic.
  • Winkler P; Department of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic.
Psychiatr Q ; 92(4): 1393-1411, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1169016
ABSTRACT
Long-stay institutions have been considerably affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to assess the mental health of clients and staff as well as quality and safety of care in long-stay institutions during the state-of-emergency in the Czech Republic in response to COVID-19 pandemic. We found a high prevalence of poor mental health outcomes in clients (46% poor well-being, 58% depression, 45% anxiety) and staff (17% poor well-being, 22% depression, 14% anxiety). In clients, COVID-19 health-related and economic worries were associated with depression (1.79, 95% CI = 1.14; 2.8 and 2.28, 95% CI = 1.27; 4.08 respectively) and anxiety (1.63, 95% CI = 1.11; 2.4 and 1.85, 95% CI = 1.2; 2.85 respectively) and in staff with any mental health outcome (1.92, 95% CI = 1.33; 2.77 and 1.75, 95% CI = 1.15; 2.66 respectively). Lack of information and communication from authorities, lack of protective equipment and logistic difficulties were reported as challenges. Delivery of care was mostly disrupted as well as admission and discharge processes. Other reported issues included lack of staff, lack of activities for patients or an increase in usage of restrictive measures. Best practices and key future measures were identified by each institution, a summary of which is presented in the article.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Health Care / Pandemics / Patient Safety / COVID-19 / Mental Disorders Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Topics: Long Covid Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Psychiatr Q Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S11126-021-09912-z

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Health Care / Pandemics / Patient Safety / COVID-19 / Mental Disorders Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Topics: Long Covid Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Psychiatr Q Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S11126-021-09912-z