Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Acceptability of a home-based visual field test (Eyecatcher) for glaucoma home monitoring: a qualitative study of patients' views and experiences.
Jones, Lee; Callaghan, Tamsin; Campbell, Peter; Jones, Pete R; Taylor, Deanna J; Asfaw, Daniel S; Edgar, David F; Crabb, David P.
  • Jones L; Division of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
  • Callaghan T; Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Campbell P; Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.
  • Jones PR; Division of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK Tamsin.Callaghan@city.ac.uk.
  • Taylor DJ; Division of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
  • Asfaw DS; Department of Ophthalmology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Edgar DF; Division of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
  • Crabb DP; Division of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
BMJ Open ; 11(4): e043130, 2021 04 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1169874
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To explore the acceptability of home visual field (VF) testing using Eyecatcher among people with glaucoma participating in a 6-month home monitoring pilot study.

DESIGN:

Qualitative study using face-to-face semistructured interviews. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.

SETTING:

Participants were recruited in the UK through an advertisement in the International Glaucoma Association (now Glaucoma UK) newsletter.

PARTICIPANTS:

Twenty adults (10 women; median age 71 years) with a diagnosis of glaucoma were recruited (including open angle and normal tension glaucoma; mean deviation=2.5 to -29.9 dB).

RESULTS:

All participants could successfully perform VF testing at home. Interview data were coded into four overarching themes regarding experiences of undertaking VF home monitoring and attitudes towards its wider implementation in healthcare (1) comparisons between Eyecatcher and Humphrey Field Analyser (HFA); (2) capability using Eyecatcher; (3) practicalities for effective wider scale implementation; (4) motivations for home monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS:

Participants identified a broad range of benefits to VF home monitoring and discussed areas for service improvement. Eyecatcher was compared positively with conventional VF testing using HFA. Home monitoring may be acceptable to at least a subset of people with glaucoma.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Glaucoma / Visual Field Tests Type of study: Diagnostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2020-043130

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Glaucoma / Visual Field Tests Type of study: Diagnostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2020-043130