Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Challenges and opportunities of the COVID-19 pandemic for perinatal mental health care: a mixed-methods study of mental health care staff.
Wilson, C A; Dalton-Locke, C; Johnson, S; Simpson, A; Oram, S; Howard, L M.
  • Wilson CA; Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. claire.1.wilson@kcl.ac.uk.
  • Dalton-Locke C; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. claire.1.wilson@kcl.ac.uk.
  • Johnson S; NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
  • Simpson A; NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
  • Oram S; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Howard LM; Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Arch Womens Ment Health ; 24(5): 749-757, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1172393
Preprint
This scientific journal article is probably based on a previously available preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See preprint
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to explore staff perceptions of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health service delivery and outcomes for women who were pregnant or in the first year after birth ('perinatal' women). Secondary analysis was undertaken of an online mixed-methods survey open to all mental health care staff in the UK involving 363 staff working with women in the perinatal period. Staff perceived the mental health of perinatal women to be particularly vulnerable to the impact of stressors associated with the pandemic such as social isolation (rated by 79.3% as relevant or extremely relevant; 288/363) and domestic violence and abuse (53.3%; 192/360). As a result of changes to mental health and other health and social care services, staff reported feeling less able to assess women, particularly their relationship with their baby (43.3%; 90/208), and to mobilise safeguarding procedures (29.4%; 62/211). While 42% of staff reported that some women engaged poorly with virtual appointments, they also found flexible remote consulting to be beneficial for some women and helped time management due to reductions in travel time. Delivery of perinatal care needs to be tailored to women's needs; virtual appointments are perceived not to be appropriate for assessments but may be helpful for some women in subsequent interactions. Safeguarding and other risk assessment procedures must remain robust in spite of modifications made to service delivery during pandemics.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Mental Health Services Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: English Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Journal subject: Psychology / Women's Health Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00737-021-01108-5

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Mental Health Services Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: English Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Journal subject: Psychology / Women's Health Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00737-021-01108-5