Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Virtual Care in Rhinology.
Smith, Kristine A; Thamboo, Andrew; Chan, Yvonne; Chin, Christopher J; Werger, Megan; Rotenberg, Brian.
  • Smith KA; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Manitoba, GB421B - 820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. kristine.smith2012@gmail.com.
  • Thamboo A; Division of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Chan Y; Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Chin CJ; Divsion of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dalhousie University, Saint John, NB, Canada.
  • Werger M; McMaster University, Toronto, Canada.
  • Rotenberg B; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 50(1): 24, 2021 Apr 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1192204
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) pandemic has resulted in an increase in virtual care. While some specialties are well suited to virtual care, Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery could be limited due to reliance on physical examination and nasal endoscopy, including Rhinology. It is likely virtual care will remain integrated for the foreseeable future and it is important to determine the strengths and weaknesses of this treatment modality for rhinology.

METHODS:

A survey on virtual care in rhinology was distributed to 61 Canadian rhinologists. The primary objective was to determine how virtual care compared to in-person care in each area of a typical appointment. Other areas focused on platforms used to deliver virtual care and which patients could be appropriately assessed by virtual visits.

RESULTS:

43 participants responded (response rate 70.5%). The majority of participants use the telephone as their primary platform. History taking and reviewing results (lab work, imaging) were reported to be equivalent in virtual care. Non-urgent follow up and new patients were thought to be the most appropriate for virtual care. The inability to perform exams and nasal endoscopy were reported to be significant limitations.

CONCLUSION:

It is important to understand the strengths and limitations of virtual care. These results identify the perceived strengths and weaknesses of virtual care in rhinology, and will help rhinologists understand the role of virtual care in their practices.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Otolaryngology / Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases / Telemedicine / Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S40463-021-00505-1

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Otolaryngology / Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases / Telemedicine / Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S40463-021-00505-1