Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Efficacy and safety of lopinavir-ritonavir in COVID-19: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Patel, Tejas K; Patel, Parvati B; Barvaliya, Manish; Saurabh, Manoj Kumar; Bhalla, Hira Lal; Khosla, Prem Parkash.
  • Patel TK; Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh 273008, India. Electronic address: dr.tkp2006@yahoo.co.in.
  • Patel PB; Department of Pharmacology, GMERS Medical College, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat 390021, India.
  • Barvaliya M; Department of Pharmacology,Government Medical College, Bhavnagar, 364001 Gujarat, India.
  • Saurabh MK; Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand 814142, India.
  • Bhalla HL; Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh 273008, India.
  • Khosla PP; Department of Pharmacology, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana 133207, India.
J Infect Public Health ; 14(6): 740-748, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1193397
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Lopinavir-ritonavir is a repurposed drug for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). In this study, a pooled effect of lopinavir-ritonavir on mortality, virological cure, radiological improvement and safety profile in COVID-19 patients has been evaluated.

METHODS:

The databases were searched for comparative randomized controlled studies evaluating the efficacy and/or safety of lopinavir-ritonavir in COVID-19 patients. The mortality outcome was pooled as a risk difference (RD) with 95% CI. The virological cure, radiological improvement and adverse events were pooled as risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. All outcomes were pooled using the Mantle-Hanzle method random effect model. The heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test.

RESULTS:

Out of 82 full text assessed, seven studies were included in the analysis. The included studies had five different control

interventions:

supportive care (n=4), umifenovir (arbidol) (n=2), navaferon (recombinant anti-tumour and anti-virus protein) (n=1), lopinavir-ritonavir+novaferon (n=1) and lopinavir-ritonavir+interferon beta 1b+ribavirin (n=1). Lopinavir-ritonavir group did not show significant difference in mortality [RD 0.00 (95% CI -0.01, 0.02), I2=0], virological cure [RR 1.06 (95% CI 0.85, 1.31), I2=0%], radiological improvement [RR 0.81 (95% CI 0.62, 1.05)] and adverse events [RR 2.59 (95% CI 0.17, 38.90), I2=75%] than supportive care. Similarly, no difference was observed for any efficacy outcomes between lopinavir-ritonavir and other control interventions. We observed significantly high risk of adverse events with lopinavir-ritonavir as compared to umifenovir [RR 2.96 (95% CI 1.42-6.18); I2=0%].

CONCLUSION:

There is no benefit of the addition of lopinavir-ritonavir to the standard care in COVID-19 patients.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ritonavir / COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Infect Public Health Journal subject: Communicable Diseases / Public Health Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ritonavir / COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Infect Public Health Journal subject: Communicable Diseases / Public Health Year: 2021 Document Type: Article