Your browser doesn't support javascript.
[Rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigenic test: definition, legislation of use, technological principles, analytical and clinical performance comparison]. / Tests rapides antigéniques SARS-CoV-2 : définition, législation d'utilisation, principes technologiques, comparaison des performances analytiques et cliniques.
Lim, Isabelle; Gautheret-Dejean, Agnès.
  • Lim I; Service de virologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix, APHP, Paris, France.
  • Gautheret-Dejean A; Service de virologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix, APHP, Paris, France, Université de Paris, Inserm UMR-S U1139 3PHM, Paris, France, Laboratoire de microbiologie, Université de Paris, Faculté de pharmacie, Paris, France.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 79(2): 123-142, 2021 Apr 01.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1195963
ABSTRACT
The SARS-CoV-2 has emerged in China at the end of 2019. In order to meet the growing demand in laboratories for RT-PCR testing for viral genome detection, rapid tests detecting a SARS-CoV-2 protein (antigenic rapid test) have been developed. In this review, we present for different SARS-CoV-2 antigenic rapid tests authorized in France legislation, technological principle, and analytical and clinical performances. Data bellow are those provided by the manufacturer/distributor. From the list of tests authorized by the French Ministry of Health, we have selected 25 for which the distributors/manufacturers have provided the technical data essential to their comparative analysis. The kits use immunochromatography technology, with detection of the nucleocapsid protein (n = 24) or the spike protein (n = 1). The matrix used is a nasopharyngeal (n = 23), oropharyngeal (n = 9) or nasal (n = 3) swab. According to the test, the reading of the result is done from 15 to 30 minutes after it is performed. The clinical sensitivity, for the more performant tests is conversely linked to the Ct of RT-PCR, ranging from 80.2% to 98.4%, according to the quantity of virus present in the sample. This percentage is inversely proportional to the Ct obtained using RT-PCR. The limit of detection ranges from 31.55 to 7200 TCID50/mL. The clinical specificity, compared to a negative result of RT-PCR, is between 99.2% and 100%. Analytical specificity evaluated on other microorganisms is 100%, except for 3 kits that show cross-reactivities with SARS-CoV-1 (n = 3) and MERS-CoV (n = 1). Positive and negative predictive values range from 96.3% to 100% and 95% to 99.4%, respectively.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: French Journal: Ann Biol Clin (Paris) Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Abc.2021.1635

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: French Journal: Ann Biol Clin (Paris) Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Abc.2021.1635