Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Management of odontogenic cervicofacial infections presenting to oral and maxillofacial units during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom.
Puglia, F A; Ubhi, H; Dawoud, B; Magennis, P; Chiu, G A.
  • Puglia FA; BAOMS Project Manager, British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons of England, 35/43 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.
  • Ubhi H; Northwick Park Hospital, Watford, HA1 3UJ.
  • Dawoud B; Pennine Acute Hospitals, NHS Trust, Fairfield General Hospital, Bury BL9 7TD.
  • Magennis P; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL.
  • Chiu GA; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn BB2 3HH. Electronic address: Geoff.Chiu@nhs.net.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 59(8): 875-880, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1202959
ABSTRACT
On 25 March 2020, the Chief Dental Officer issued national guidance restricting the provision of all routine, non-urgent dental services in response to the spread of COVID-19. We analysed odontogenic cervicofacial infections (CFI) presenting to oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) departments during the first wave of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom. From 1 April 2020 until 31 July 2020 a database was used to prospectively collect records for all patients with CFI who presented to oral and maxillofacial teams. Information gathered included clinical presentation, location/origin of infection, and how this was managed. The OMFS units were asked to compare the patient's care with the treatment that would usually have been given prior to the crisis. A total of 32 OMFS units recorded 1381 cases of CFI in the UK. Most of the infections were referred via the emergency department (74%). Lower first or second molars were the most common origin, contributing 40% of CFI. Collaborators reported that patients' treatments were modified as a response to COVID in 20% of cases, the most frequently cited reason being the application of COVID-19 hospital policy (85%). The impact of the first wave of COVID modified the management of a significant number of patients presenting with CFI, and there was a proactive move to avoid general anaesthetics where possible. Some patients who presented to secondary care were given no treatment, suggesting they could have been managed in primary dental care if this had been available. We recommend that OMFS units and urgent dental care centres (UDCCs) build strong communication links not only to provide the best possible patient care, but to minimise COVID exposure and the strain on emergency departments during the pandemic.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg Year: 2021 Document Type: Article