Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections.
Hellewell, Joel; Russell, Timothy W; Beale, Rupert; Kelly, Gavin; Houlihan, Catherine; Nastouli, Eleni; Kucharski, Adam J.
  • Hellewell J; Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. lshjh2@lshtm.ac.uk.
  • Russell TW; Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • Beale R; Cell Biology of Infection Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute; Division of Medicine, UCL, London, UK.
  • Kelly G; Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
  • Houlihan C; Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
  • Nastouli E; Department of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK.
  • Kucharski AJ; Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
BMC Med ; 19(1): 106, 2021 04 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1204075
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Routine asymptomatic testing using RT-PCR of people who interact with vulnerable populations, such as medical staff in hospitals or care workers in care homes, has been employed to help prevent outbreaks among vulnerable populations. Although the peak sensitivity of RT-PCR can be high, the probability of detecting an infection will vary throughout the course of an infection. The effectiveness of routine asymptomatic testing will therefore depend on testing frequency and how PCR detection varies over time.

METHODS:

We fitted a Bayesian statistical model to a dataset of twice weekly PCR tests of UK healthcare workers performed by self-administered nasopharyngeal swab, regardless of symptoms. We jointly estimated times of infection and the probability of a positive PCR test over time following infection; we then compared asymptomatic testing strategies by calculating the probability that a symptomatic infection is detected before symptom onset and the probability that an asymptomatic infection is detected within 7 days of infection.

RESULTS:

We estimated that the probability that the PCR test detected infection peaked at 77% (54-88%) 4 days after infection, decreasing to 50% (38-65%) by 10 days after infection. Our results suggest a substantially higher probability of detecting infections 1-3 days after infection than previously published estimates. We estimated that testing every other day would detect 57% (33-76%) of symptomatic cases prior to onset and 94% (75-99%) of asymptomatic cases within 7 days if test results were returned within a day.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results suggest that routine asymptomatic testing can enable detection of a high proportion of infected individuals early in their infection, provided that the testing is frequent and the time from testing to notification of results is sufficiently fast.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Polymerase Chain Reaction / COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: BMC Med Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12916-021-01982-x

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Polymerase Chain Reaction / COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: BMC Med Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12916-021-01982-x