Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Risk assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infection in free-ranging wild animals in Belgium.
Logeot, Myriam; Mauroy, Axel; Thiry, Etienne; De Regge, Nick; Vervaeke, Muriel; Beck, Olivier; De Waele, Valérie; Van den Berg, Thierry.
  • Logeot M; Department of Animal Health and Safety of Animal Products, Directorate General Control Policy, Federal Agency for Safety of the Food Chain, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Mauroy A; Staff Direction for Risk Assessment, Directorate General Control Policy, Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Thiry E; Veterinary Virology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, FARAH Research Center, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
  • De Regge N; Scientific Direction Viral Diseases in Animals, Sciensano, National Reference Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Vervaeke M; Policy Department-Wildlife disease management, Agency for Nature and Forests, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Beck O; Department Biodiversity, Brussels Environment, Brussels, Belgium.
  • De Waele V; Department of Environmental and Agricultural Studies, Public Service of Wallonia, Gembloux, Belgium.
  • Van den Berg T; Scientific Director for Animal Infectious Diseases, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 69(3): 986-996, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1205993
ABSTRACT
The aim of this review paper is to evaluate the putative susceptibilities of different free-ranging wild animal species in Belgium to SARS-CoV-2 and provide a risk assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infection in those animals. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, natural SARS-CoV-2 infections have mainly been confirmed in domestic and production animals, and in wild animals kept in captivity, although the numbers remain limited when compared to human cases. Recently, the first SARS-CoV-2 infections in presumably escaped minks found in the wild have been detected, further addressing the much-feared scenario of transmission of the virus to animals living in the wild and its consequences. Considering the most likely origin of the virus being a wild animal and the putative susceptibilities of free-ranging wild animal species to SARS-CoV-2, the risk of infection with possible establishment of the virus in these populations has to be investigated closely. The authors conclude that most attention should be given to surveillance and awareness-raising activities for SARS-CoV-2 infection in wild mustelids, bats, wild canids and felids, particularly these collected in wildlife rescue centres. People involved in frequent and close contact with wild animals should take all necessary precautionary measures to protect wild animals against exposure to the virus. More than one year after the first detection of SARS-CoV-2 in humans, the time has come to increase investments in research and surveillance activities in animals, including in free-ranging wild animals, as part of a One Health control of this pandemic. This study focussing on Belgium could be helpful for other countries with similar animal densities and ecosystems.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Animals / Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Transbound Emerg Dis Journal subject: Veterinary Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Tbed.14131

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Animals / Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Transbound Emerg Dis Journal subject: Veterinary Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Tbed.14131