Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Target specific serologic analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma.
Ikegami, Sachie; Benirschke, Robert C; Fakhrai-Rad, Hossein; Motamedi, Mohammad H; Hockett, Rick; David, Sean; Lee, Hong Kee; Kang, Jason; Gniadek, Thomas J.
  • Ikegami S; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, United States of America.
  • Benirschke RC; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, United States of America.
  • Fakhrai-Rad H; Genalyte Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
  • Motamedi MH; Genalyte Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
  • Hockett R; Genalyte Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
  • David S; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, United States of America.
  • Lee HK; Department of Family Medicine, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
  • Kang J; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, United States of America.
  • Gniadek TJ; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 16(4): e0249938, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1206195
ABSTRACT
This study compared the performance of four serology assays for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and investigated whether COVID-19 disease history correlates with assay performance. Samples were tested at Northshore using the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Roche Diagnostics), Access SARS-CoV-2 IgG anti-RBD (Beckman Coulter), and LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (DiaSorin) as well as at Genalyte using Maverick Multi-Antigen Serology Panel. The study included one hundred clinical samples collected before December 2019 and ninety-seven samples collected from convalescent plasma donors originally diagnosed with COVID-19 by PCR. COVID-19 disease history was self-reported by the plasma donors. There was no difference in specificity between the assays tested. Clinical sensitivity of these four tests was 98% (Genalyte), 96% (Roche), 92% (DiaSorin), and 87% (Beckman). The only statistically significant differences in clinical sensitivity was between the Beckman assay and both Genalyte and Roche assays. Convalescent plasma donor characteristics and disease symptoms did not correlate with false negative results from the Beckman and DiaSorin assays. All four tests showed high specificity (100%) and varying sensitivities (89-98%). No correlations between disease history and serology results were observed. The Genalyte Multiplex assay showed as good or better sensitivity to three other previously validated assays with FDA Emergency Use Authorizations.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0249938

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0249938