Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Machine learning automatically detects COVID-19 using chest CTs in a large multicenter cohort.
Mortani Barbosa, Eduardo J; Georgescu, Bogdan; Chaganti, Shikha; Aleman, Gorka Bastarrika; Cabrero, Jordi Broncano; Chabin, Guillaume; Flohr, Thomas; Grenier, Philippe; Grbic, Sasa; Gupta, Nakul; Mellot, François; Nicolaou, Savvas; Re, Thomas; Sanelli, Pina; Sauter, Alexander W; Yoo, Youngjin; Ziebandt, Valentin; Comaniciu, Dorin.
  • Mortani Barbosa EJ; Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Ground Floor Founders Bldg, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Eduardo.Barbosa@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
  • Georgescu B; Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Eduardo.Barbosa@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
  • Chaganti S; Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Aleman GB; Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Cabrero JB; Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain.
  • Chabin G; Health Time, Jaén, Spain.
  • Flohr T; Siemens Healthineers, Paris, France.
  • Grenier P; Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany.
  • Grbic S; Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.
  • Gupta N; Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Mellot F; Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Nicolaou S; Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.
  • Re T; Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Sanelli P; Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Sauter AW; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
  • Yoo Y; University Hospital Basel, Clinic of Radiology & Nuclear medicine, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Ziebandt V; Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Comaniciu D; Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany.
Eur Radiol ; 31(11): 8775-8785, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1209506
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate machine learning classifiers and interpretable models using chest CT for detection of COVID-19 and differentiation from other pneumonias, interstitial lung disease (ILD) and normal CTs.

METHODS:

Our retrospective multi-institutional study obtained 2446 chest CTs from 16 institutions (including 1161 COVID-19 patients). Training/validation/testing cohorts included 1011/50/100 COVID-19, 388/16/33 ILD, 189/16/33 other pneumonias, and 559/17/34 normal (no pathologies) CTs. A metric-based approach for the classification of COVID-19 used interpretable features, relying on logistic regression and random forests. A deep learning-based classifier differentiated COVID-19 via 3D features extracted directly from CT attenuation and probability distribution of airspace opacities.

RESULTS:

Most discriminative features of COVID-19 are the percentage of airspace opacity and peripheral and basal predominant opacities, concordant with the typical characterization of COVID-19 in the literature. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering compares feature distribution across COVID-19 and control cohorts. The metrics-based classifier achieved AUC = 0.83, sensitivity = 0.74, and specificity = 0.79 versus respectively 0.93, 0.90, and 0.83 for the DL-based classifier. Most of ambiguity comes from non-COVID-19 pneumonia with manifestations that overlap with COVID-19, as well as mild COVID-19 cases. Non-COVID-19 classification performance is 91% for ILD, 64% for other pneumonias, and 94% for no pathologies, which demonstrates the robustness of our method against different compositions of control groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our new method accurately discriminates COVID-19 from other types of pneumonia, ILD, and CTs with no pathologies, using quantitative imaging features derived from chest CT, while balancing interpretability of results and classification performance and, therefore, may be useful to facilitate diagnosis of COVID-19. KEY POINTS • Unsupervised clustering reveals the key tomographic features including percent airspace opacity and peripheral and basal opacities most typical of COVID-19 relative to control groups. • COVID-19-positive CTs were compared with COVID-19-negative chest CTs (including a balanced distribution of non-COVID-19 pneumonia, ILD, and no pathologies). Classification accuracies for COVID-19, pneumonia, ILD, and CT scans with no pathologies are respectively 90%, 64%, 91%, and 94%. • Our deep learning (DL)-based classification method demonstrates an AUC of 0.93 (sensitivity 90%, specificity 83%). Machine learning methods applied to quantitative chest CT metrics can therefore improve diagnostic accuracy in suspected COVID-19, particularly in resource-constrained environments.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Eur Radiol Journal subject: Radiology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00330-021-07937-3

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Eur Radiol Journal subject: Radiology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00330-021-07937-3