Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Formation and validation of an acute care clinical pharmacist productivity model: Part 2.
Simmons, Adrienne; Vest, Tyler A; Cicci, Jonathan; Clarke, Megan; Morbitzer, Kathryn A; Valgus, John M; Falato, Chris; Colmenares, Evan W; Vest, Mary-Haston; Waldron, Kayla M.
  • Simmons A; University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Vest TA; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Cicci J; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Clarke M; Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC.
  • Morbitzer KA; University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Valgus JM; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Falato C; University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Colmenares EW; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Vest MH; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Waldron KM; University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 78(15): 1410-1416, 2021 07 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1217812
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of the project described here was to use the work outputs identified in part 1 of a 2-part research initiative to build and validate an acute care clinical pharmacist productivity model.

METHODS:

Following the identification of work outputs in part 1 of the project, relative weighting was assigned to all outputs based on the time intensity and complexity of each task. The number of pharmacists verifying an inpatient medication order each day was selected to represent the labor input. A multivariable linear regression was performed to determine the final work outputs for inclusion in the model. Productivity and productivity index values were calculated for each day from July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019.

RESULTS:

Of the 27 work outputs identified via consensus by the clinical pharmacist working team, 17 work outputs were ultimately included in the productivity model. The average productivity during the period July 2018 through June 2019 was derived from the model and will serve as the baseline productivity for acute care clinical pharmacists.

CONCLUSION:

Validated consensus methodology can be useful for engaging clinical pharmacist in decision-making and developing a clinical productivity model. When thoughtfully designed, the model can replace obsolete measures of productivity that do not account for the responsibilities of clinical pharmacists.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pharmacists / Professional Role Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Journal subject: Pharmacy / Hospitals Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ajhp

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pharmacists / Professional Role Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Journal subject: Pharmacy / Hospitals Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ajhp