Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Preparation for airway management in Australia and New Zealand ICUs during the COVID -19 pandemic.
Brewster, David J; Nickson, Christopher P; McGloughlin, Steve; Pilcher, David; Sarode, Vineet V; Gatward, Jonathan J.
  • Brewster DJ; Intensive Care Unit, Cabrini Hospital, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.
  • Nickson CP; Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • McGloughlin S; Intensive Care Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Pilcher D; Centre for Health Innovation, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Sarode VV; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Gatward JJ; Intensive Care Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0251523, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1219018
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This paper aimed to describe the airway practices of intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand specific to patients presenting with COVID-19 and to inform whether consistent clinical practice was achieved. Specific clinical airway guidelines were endorsed in March 2020 by the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) and College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). METHODS AND

FINDINGS:

Prospective, structured questionnaire for all ICU directors in Australia and New Zealand was completed by 69 ICU directors after email invitation from ANZICS. The online questionnaire was accessible for three weeks during September 2020 and analysed by cloud-based software. Basic ICU demographics (private or public, metropolitan or rural) and location, purchasing, airway management practices, guideline uptake, checklist and cognitive aid use and staff training relevant to airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic were the main outcome measures. The 69 ICU directors reported significant simulation-based inter-professional airway training of staff (97%), and use of video laryngoscopy (94%), intubation checklists (94%), cognitive aids (83%) and PPE "spotters" (89%) during the airway management of patients with COVID-19. Tracheal intubation was almost always performed by a Specialist (97% of ICUs), who was more likely to be an intensivist than an anaesthetist (61% vs 36%). There was a more frequent adoption of specific airway guidelines for the management of COVID-19 patients in public ICUs (94% vs 71%) and reliance on specialist intensivists to perform intubations in private ICUs (92% vs 53%).

CONCLUSION:

There was a high uptake of a standardised approach to airway management in COVID-19 patients in ICUs in Australia and New Zealand, likely due to endorsement of national guidelines.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Airway Management / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0251523

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Airway Management / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0251523